Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34211277›Full record

ArticleHealth services insights2021

Evaluation of Inpatient Experience at Some Clinical Departments of Kien Giang General Hospital, Kien Giang Province, Vietnam, 2020: An Analytical Cross-Sectional Study.

Phuoc Thao Nguyen Vo, Anh Tuan Tran, Hoat Van Nguyen, Minh Van Hoang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health services insights, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Phuoc Thao Nguyen VoKien Giang General Hospital, RạchGiá, Kiên Giang, Viet Nam.
Anh Tuan TranHanoi University of Public Health, Hanoi, Vietnam.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1028-2713
Hoat Van NguyenHanoi Medical University Hospital, Hanoi, Vietnam.
Minh Van HoangHanoi University of Public Health, Hanoi, Vietnam.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Patient experience is being widely considered in evaluating the quality of health care services. This is a cross-sectional study with 860 inpatients hospitalized in 4 clinical departments (General Internal Medicine; Cardiology; General Surgery; Surgery, and Orthopedic Trauma) of the Kien Giang General Hospital, from April to June 2020. Data was collected through a two-part questionnaire used to evaluate the inpatient experience during hospital treatment, using the Likert scale 5 points. The patient's experience is classified into 3 aspects (environment-facilities, healthcare staff's care, treatment information). In total, 815 participants responded to the interview (94.8%). The rates of patients having a positive experience on the environment and facilities, the care of health workers, and treatment information are 31.7%, 85.9%, and 74.2%, respectively. The patient's positive overall experience rate is 65.5%. Factors related to the patient's overall experience are the department of treatment, residential area, age, and employment status (

Indexed as

environment—facilitiesgeneral hospitalhealthcare staff’s careInpatient experienceKien Giang provincetreatment informationVietnam

Identifiers

PMID34211277
PMCPMC8216414

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.