ArticleNature2021
Everyone should decide how their digital data are used - not just tech companies.
Article in Nature, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Alzheimer's disease digital biomarkers multidimensional landscape and AI model scoping review.NPJ digital medicine · 2025Article
- Ethical considerations on the use of big data and artificial intelligence in kidney research from the ERA ethics committee.Nephrology, dialysis, transplantation : official publication of the European Dialysis and Transplant Association - European Renal Association · 2025Review
- Employing digital technologies for effective governance: Taiwan's experience in COVID-19 prevention.Health policy and technology · 2023Article
- Biomolecular sensors for advanced physiological monitoring.Nature reviews bioengineering · 2023Review
- Brave (in a) new world: an ethical perspective on chatbots for medical advice.Frontiers in public health · 2023Article
- Reimagining health services provision for neglected groups: The "personalization from below" phenomenon.Frontiers in sociology · 2023Article
- The field of human building interaction for convergent research and innovation for intelligent built environments.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- Building trust in research through information and intent transparency with health information: representative cross-sectional survey of 502 US adults.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
34211184What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.