Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34211035›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2021

Virtually spatialized sounds enhance auditory processing in healthy participants and patients with a disorder of consciousness.

Lizette Heine, Alexandra Corneyllie, Florent Gobert, Jacques Luauté, Mathieu Lavandier, Fabien Perrin

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02742506 (Beneficial Effects of Music on Cognition and Consciousness Level), which is not on this map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02742506 nacompletednot on this map

Beneficial Effects of Music on Cognition and Consciousness Level

TypeinterventionalSponsorHospices Civils de LyonRan2013 to 2019Enrolled86ConditionsComaArmsElectroencephalography (EEG)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Conceptualized Immersive Projection Environment (CIPE-NRTInternational journal of clinical pediatric dentistry · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Lizette HeineAudition Cognition and Psychoacoustics Team, Lyon Neuroscience Research Center, UCBL, INSERM U1028, CNRS UMR5292, Centre Hospitalier Le Vinatier, Bâtiment 462, Neurocampus Michel Jouvet, 95 Boulevard Pinel, Bron Cedex, 69675, Lyon, France.
Alexandra CorneyllieAudition Cognition and Psychoacoustics Team, Lyon Neuroscience Research Center, UCBL, INSERM U1028, CNRS UMR5292, Centre Hospitalier Le Vinatier, Bâtiment 462, Neurocampus Michel Jouvet, 95 Boulevard Pinel, Bron Cedex, 69675, Lyon, France.
Florent GobertAudition Cognition and Psychoacoustics Team, Lyon Neuroscience Research Center, UCBL, INSERM U1028, CNRS UMR5292, Centre Hospitalier Le Vinatier, Bâtiment 462, Neurocampus Michel Jouvet, 95 Boulevard Pinel, Bron Cedex, 69675, Lyon, France.
Jacques LuautéService de Médecine Physique et de Réadaptation, Rééducation Neurologique, Hôpital Henry-Gabrielle, CHU de Lyon, 69230, Saint-Genis-Laval, France.
Mathieu LavandierLaboratoire de Tribologie et Dynamique des Systèmes UMR 5513, ENTPE, University of Lyon, Rue Maurice Audin, 69518, Vaulx-en-Velin Cedex, France.
Fabien PerrinAudition Cognition and Psychoacoustics Team, Lyon Neuroscience Research Center, UCBL, INSERM U1028, CNRS UMR5292, Centre Hospitalier Le Vinatier, Bâtiment 462, Neurocampus Michel Jouvet, 95 Boulevard Pinel, Bron Cedex, 69675, Lyon, France. Fabien.perrin@univ-lyon1.fr.
Centre Hospitalier Le Vinatier · FRCentre de Recherche en Neurosciences de Lyon · FRCentre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FRInserm · FRUniversité Claude Bernard Lyon 1 · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Neuroscientific and clinical studies on auditory perception often use headphones to limit sound interference. In these conditions, sounds are perceived as internalized because they lack the sound-attributes that normally occur with a sound produced from a point in space around the listener. Without the spatial attention mechanisms that occur with localized sounds, auditory functional assessments could thus be underestimated. We hypothesize that adding virtually externalization and localization cues to sounds through headphones enhance sound discrimination in both healthy participants and patients with a disorder of consciousness (DOC). Hd-EEG was analyzed in 14 healthy participants and 18 patients while they listened to self-relevant and irrelevant stimuli in two forms: diotic (classic sound presentation with an "internalized" feeling) and convolved with a binaural room impulse response (to create an "externalized" feeling). Convolution enhanced the brains' discriminative response as well as the processing of irrelevant sounds itself, in both healthy participants and DOC patients. For the healthy participants, these effects could be associated with enhanced activation of both the dorsal (where/how) and ventral (what) auditory streams, suggesting that spatial attributes support speech discrimination. Thus, virtually spatialized sounds might "call attention to the outside world" and improve the sensitivity of assessment of brain function in DOC patients.

Indexed as

Auditory PerceptionAdultConsciousnessConsciousness DisordersFemaleHealthy VolunteersHumansMaleMiddle AgedSoundSound LocalizationSpeech PerceptionYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID34211035
PMCPMC8249625
OpenAlexW3176590289

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.