ReviewNPJ genomic medicine2021
Genetic discrimination: introducing the Asian perspective to the debate.
Review in NPJ genomic medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
27 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Ethical issues in genomics research in persons with Alzheimer's Disease/Alzheimer's Disease-related dementia (AD/ADRD): a systematic review.BMC medical ethics · 2024Pooled it
- Strengthening legal safeguards against genetic discrimination: review and recommendations for Malaysia.Journal of community genetics · 2026Review
- Attitudes Toward Sex-Specific Versus Universal Newborn Screening for X-Linked Adrenoleukodystrophy in Hong Kong.International journal of neonatal screening · 2026Article
- Patient and IRB perspectives on biobank consent models: implications for international policy from Taiwan.BMC medical ethics · 2026Article
- Public perceptions of genetic sequencing in China: barriers and drivers of adoption.European journal of human genetics : EJHG · 2026Article
- Polygenic risk scores: Navigating the future of precision medicine through economic, ethical, and scientific advancements.iScience · 2026Review
- Knowledge graph visualization and retrospective analysis of genetic research on pediatric cardiomyopathy (2000-2024).Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Article
- Coevolution of Human Diet and Gut Microbiome: Implications for Nutrigenomics and Cross-Population Health.International journal of microbiology · 2026Review
- Addressing genetic discrimination for stronger legal protections and enhanced public awareness.NPJ genomic medicine · 2025Article
- Re-consent practices in biobanks in Japan: current status and stakeholder perspectives.Journal of community genetics · 2025Article
- Genomic sequencing: the case for equity of care in the era of personalized medicine.Pediatric research · 2025Review
- Ethical challenges of conducting and reviewing human genomics research in Malaysia: An exploratory study.Developing world bioethics · 2024Article
- "Using dried blood spots beyond newborn screening - is Hong Kong ready?": navigating the intersection of innovation readiness, privacy concerns, and Chinese parenting culture.BMC public health · 2024Article
- "Uninsurable because of a genetic test": a qualitative study of consumer views about the use of genetic test results in Australian life insurance.European journal of human genetics : EJHG · 2024Article
- Contributing to an autism biobank: Diverse perspectives from autistic participants, family members and researchers.Autism : the international journal of research and practice · 2024Article
- Future implications of polygenic risk scores for life insurance underwriting.NPJ genomic medicine · 2024Review
- Community concerns about genetic discrimination in life insurance persist in Australia: A survey of consumers offered genetic testing.European journal of human genetics : EJHG · 2024Article
- Clinical Strategies in Gene Screening Counseling for the Healthy General Population.Korean journal of family medicine · 2024Article
- Commoning genomic solidarity to improve global health equality.Cell genomics · 2023Review
- Is legislation to prevent genetic discrimination necessary in Japan? An overview of the current policies and public attitudes.Journal of human genetics · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Our article aims to provide a comprehensive portrayal of how seven Asian jurisdictions have sought to address the challenge of genetic discrimination (GD) by presenting an analysis of the relevant legislation, policies, and practices. Based on our findings, policy discussion and action on preventing or mitigating GD have been narrowly framed in terms of employment, insurance, disability, marriage, and family planning. Except for South Korea, none of the jurisdictions we examined has adopted specific legislation to prevent GD. However, for Asia to truly benefit from its recent scientific and technological progress in genomics, we highlight the need for these jurisdictions to engage more proactively with the challenges of GD through a coordinated regulatory and governance mechanism.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.