Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34210681›Full record

Trial reportClinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research2021

Standard-Dose Pembrolizumab Plus Alternate-Dose Ipilimumab in Advanced Melanoma: KEYNOTE-029 Cohort 1C, a Phase 2 Randomized Study of Two Dosing Schedules.

Georgina V Long, Caroline Robert, Marcus O Butler, Felix Couture, Matteo S Carlino, Steven O'Day, Victoria Atkinson, Jonathan S Cebon, Michael P Brown, Stéphane Dalle and 8 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 38 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Standard Versus Modified Ipilimumab, in Combination With Nivolumab, in Advanced Renal Cell Carcinoma: A Randomized Phase II Trial (PRISM).Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2024
    Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors at 16 institutions in 5 countries.

Georgina V LongDepartment of Medical Oncology and Translational Research, Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, and Mater and Royal North Shore Hospitals, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-8894-3545
Caroline RobertDepartment of Medicine, Dermatology Service, Gustave Roussy, Paris-Saclay University, Villejuif, France.ORCID 0000-0002-9493-0238
Marcus O ButlerDepartment of Medical Oncology, The Princess Margaret Cancer Center and University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-9840-7057
Felix CoutureDepartment of Hematology, CHU de Québec-Hôtel-Dieu de Québec, Québec City, Québec, Canada.
Matteo S CarlinoDepartment of Medicine, Westmead and Blacktown Hospitals, Melanoma Institute Australia, and The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Steven O'DayDepartment of Medical Oncology, John Wayne Cancer Institute at Providence Saint John's Health Center, Santa Monica, California.
Victoria AtkinsonUniversity of Queensland, Division of Cancer Sciences, Gallipoli Medical Research Foundation, Greenslopes Private Hospital, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
Jonathan S CebonDepartment of Hematology/Oncology, Olivia Newton-John Cancer Research Institute, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-3898-950X
Michael P BrownCancer Clinical Trials Unit, Royal Adelaide Hospital and University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
Stéphane DalleUniversity of Lyon, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Cancer Research Center of Lyon, Lyon, France.
Andrew G HillDepartment of Health, Tasman Oncology Research, Southport, Queensland, Australia.
Geoffrey T GibneyMelanoma Disease Group, Georgetown-Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Washington, DC.
Steven McCuneDepartment of Clinical Research, Wellstar Health System, Marietta, Georgia.ORCID 0000-0002-2207-9341
Alexander M MenziesDepartment of Medical Oncology and Translational Research, Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, and Mater and Royal North Shore Hospitals, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Cuizhen NiuDepartment of Clinical Oncology, MSD China, Beijing, China.
Nageatte IbrahimDepartment of Clinical Oncology, Merck & Co., Inc., Kenilworth, New Jersey.ORCID 0000-0003-0794-949X
Blanca Homet MorenoDepartment of Clinical Oncology, Merck & Co., Inc., Kenilworth, New Jersey.
Adi DiabDepartment of Melanoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
Merck & Co., Inc., Rahway, NJ, USA (United States) · USRoyal North Shore Hospital · AUGallipoli Medical Research Foundation · AUGeorgetown University Medical Center · USHôtel-Dieu de Québec · CAMelanoma Institute Australia · AUNational Clinical Research Center for Digestive Diseases · CNOlivia Newton-John Cancer Wellness & Research Centre · AUPrincess Margaret Cancer Centre · CARoyal Adelaide Hospital · AUSaint John's Health Center · USThe University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center · USTrans Tasman Radiation Oncology Group · AUUniversité Claude Bernard Lyon 1 · FRUniversité Paris-Saclay · FRWellStar Health System · US

Funding

Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp.
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeStandard-dose pembrolizumab plus alternative-dose ipilimumab (1 mg/kg Q3W for 4 doses) were tolerable and had robust antitumor activity in advanced melanoma in cohort B of the phase 1 KEYNOTE-029 study. Cohort C evaluated standard-dose pembrolizumab with two other alternative ipilimumab regimens. PATIENTS AND

methodsPatients with treatment-naive unresectable stage III/IV melanoma were randomly assigned 1:1 to pembrolizumab 200 mg Q3W for ≤24 months plus ipilimumab 50 mg Q6W for 4 doses (PEM200+IPI50), or the same pembrolizumab regimen plus ipilimumab 100 mg Q12W for 4 doses (PEM200+IPI100). Primary end points were incidence of grade 3-5 treatment-related adverse events (TRAE) and objective response rate (ORR) per RECIST v1.1 by independent central review. Per protocol-defined thresholds, grade 3-5 TRAE incidence ≤26% indicated meaningful toxicity reduction and ORR ≥48% indicated no decrease in efficacy versus data reported for other PD-1 inhibitor/ipilimumab combinations.

resultsMedian follow-up on February 18, 2019, was 16.3 months in PEM200+IPI50 (N = 51) and 16.4 months in PEM200+IPI100 (N = 51). Grade 3-5 TRAEs occurred in 12 (24%) patients in PEM200+IPI50 and 20 (39%) in PEM200+IPI100. One patient in PEM200+IPI50 died from treatment-related autoimmune myocarditis. Immune-mediated AEs or infusion reactions occurred in 21 (42%) patients in PEM200+IPI50 and 28 (55%) in PEM200+IPI100. ORR was 55% in PEM200+IPI50; 61% in PEM200+IPI100.

conclusionsPembrolizumab 200 mg Q3W plus ipilimumab 50 mg Q6W or 100 mg Q12W demonstrated antitumor activity above the predefined threshold; pembrolizumab plus ipilimumab 50 mg Q6W had lower incidence of grade 3-5 TRAEs than the predefined threshold, suggesting a reduction in toxicity. See related commentary by Jameson-Lee and Luke, p. 5153.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsMelanomaSkin NeoplasmsAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedCutaneous Malignant MelanomaHumansIpilimumabAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedIpilimumabpembrolizumab

Identifiers

PMID34210681
PMCPMC9401495
OpenAlexW3176956457

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.