Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34210669›Full record

ArticleBMJ open quality2021

Does admission order form design really matter? A reduction in urea blood test ordering.

Pamela Mathura, Cole Boettger, Reidar Hagtvedt, Yvonne Suranyi, Narmin Kassam

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open quality, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Pamela MathuraDepartment of Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
Cole BoettgerFaculty of Medicine & Dentistry, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada cboettge@ualberta.ca.ORCID 0000-0002-7049-2704
Reidar HagtvedtAlberta School of Business, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
Yvonne SuranyiEmergency Department, University of Alberta Hospital, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
Narmin KassamMedicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
University of Alberta · CAAlberta Hospital Edmonton · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionLaboratory blood testing is one of the most high-volume medical procedures and continues to increase steadily with instances of inappropriate testing resulting in significant financial implications. Studies have suggested that the design of a standard hospital admission order form and laboratory request forms influence physician test ordering behaviour, reducing inappropriate ordering and promoting resource stewardship. AIM/

methodTo redesign the standard medicine admission order form-laboratory request section to reduce inappropriate blood urea nitrogen (BUN) testing.

resultsA redesign of the standard admission order form used by general internal medicine physicians and residents in two large teaching hospitals in one health zone in Alberta, Canada led to a significant step reduction in the ordering of the BUN test on hospital admission.

conclusionsRedesigning the standard medicine admission order form-laboratory request section can have a beneficial effect on the reduction in BUN ordering altering physician ordering patterns and behaviour.

Indexed as

General PractitionersUreaBlood Urea NitrogenHematologic TestsHospitals, TeachingHumansUreacontinuous quality improvementcost–benefit analysisefficiencyorganisationalquality improvement

Identifiers

PMID34210669
PMCPMC8252868
OpenAlexW3175834238

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.