Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34210663›Full record

ArticleAJNR. American journal of neuroradiology2021

Reliability and Agreement of 2D and 3D Measurements on MRAs for Growth Assessment of Unruptured Intracranial Aneurysms.

K M Timmins, H J Kuijf, M D I Vergouwen, M J Otten, Y M Ruigrok, B K Velthuis, I C van der Schaaf

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Volumetric surveillance of brain aneurysms: Pitfalls of MRA.Interventional neuroradiology : journal of peritherapeutic neuroradiology, surgical procedures and related neurosciences · 2023
    Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

K M TimminsFrom the Image Sciences Institute (K.M.T., H.J.K.) k.m.timmins@umcutrecht.nl.ORCID 0000-0002-8178-2694
H J KuijfFrom the Image Sciences Institute (K.M.T., H.J.K.).ORCID 0000-0001-6997-9059
M D I VergouwenDepartment of Neurology and Neurosurgery (M.D.I.V., Y.M.R.).ORCID 0000-0002-6823-1628
M J Otten, UMC Utrecht Brain Center, and Department of Radiology (M.J.O., B.K.V., I.C.v.d.S), University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-3066-3441
Y M RuigrokDepartment of Neurology and Neurosurgery (M.D.I.V., Y.M.R.).ORCID 0000-0002-5396-2989
B K Velthuis, UMC Utrecht Brain Center, and Department of Radiology (M.J.O., B.K.V., I.C.v.d.S), University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-2542-9474
I C van der Schaaf, UMC Utrecht Brain Center, and Department of Radiology (M.J.O., B.K.V., I.C.v.d.S), University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-2588-264X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

background and purposeReliable and reproducible measurement of unruptured intracranial aneurysm growth is important for unruptured intracranial aneurysm rupture risk assessment. This study aimed to compare the reliability and reproducibility of 2D and 3D growth measurements of unruptured intracranial aneurysms. MATERIALS AND

methods2D height, width, and neck and 3D volume measurements of unruptured intracranial aneurysms on baseline and follow-up TOF-MRAs were performed by two observers. The reliability of individual 2D and 3D measurements and of change (growth) between paired scans was assessed (intraclass correlation coefficient) and stratified for aneurysm location. The smallest detectable change on 2D and 3D was determined. Proportions of growing aneurysms were compared, and Bland-Altman plots were created.

resultsSeventy-two patients with 84 unruptured intracranial aneurysms were included. The interobserver reliability was good-to-excellent for individual measurements (intraclass correlation coefficient  > 0.70), poor for 2D change (intraclass correlation coefficient < 0.5), and good for 3D change (intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.76). For both 2D and 3D, the reliability was location-dependent and worse for irregularly shaped aneurysms. The smallest detectable changes for 2D height, width, and neck and 3D volume measurements were 1.5 , 2.0, and 1.9 mm and 0.06 mL, respectively. The proportion of growing unruptured intracranial aneurysms decreased from 10% to 2%, depending on the definition of growth (1 mm or the smallest detectable changes for 2D and 3D).

conclusionsThe interobserver reliability of the size measurements of individual 2D and 3D unruptured intracranial aneurysms was good-to-excellent but lower for 2D and 3D growth measurements. For growth assessment, 3D measurements are more reliable than 2D measurements. The smallest detectable change for 2D measurements was larger than 1 mm, the current clinical definition of unruptured intracranial aneurysm growth.

Indexed as

Aneurysm, RupturedIntracranial AneurysmMagnetic Resonance AngiographyHumansReproducibility of ResultsRisk Assessment

Identifiers

PMID34210663
PMCPMC8423061

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.