ReviewStem cell research & therapy2021
Inter-center comparison of good manufacturing practices-compliant stromal vascular fraction and proposal for release acceptance criteria: a review of 364 productions.
Review in Stem cell research & therapy, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed.
- First comparison of commercial systems to prepare nanofat: technical performances and biological quality differ among obtained products.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Potential Medical and Surgical Applications of Stromal Vascular Fraction and Adipose-Derived Stem Cells: A Narrative Review.HSS journal : the musculoskeletal journal of Hospital for Special Surgery · 2025Review
- Challenges in the clinical translation of stromal vascular fraction therapy in regenerative medicine.World journal of stem cells · 2025Review
- Review
- Ultrasound-Guided PRP and SVF Therapy Shows Sustained Improvement in Severe Knee Osteoarthritis: A 12-Month Retrospective Study.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2024Article
- Good Manufacturing Practice-Compliant Cryopreserved and Thawed Native Adipose Tissue Ready for Fat Grafting.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Article
- Therapeutic application of adipose-derived stromal vascular fraction in myocardial infarction.iScience · 2024Review
- Clinical, Histologic, and Transcriptomic Evaluation of Sequential Fat Grafting for Morphea: A Nonrandomized Controlled Trial.JAMA dermatology · 2024Article
- Systemically delivered adipose stromal vascular fraction mitigates radiation-induced gastrointestinal syndrome by immunomodulating the inflammatory response through a CD11bStem cell research & therapy · 2023Article
- Processing Adipose Tissue Samples in a GMP Environment Standardizes the Use of SVF in Cell Therapy Treatments: Data on 302 Patients.Biomedicines · 2023Article
- Effects of Autologous Microfragmented Adipose Tissue on Healing of Tibial Plateau Levelling Osteotomies in Dogs: A Prospective Clinical Trial.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2023Article
- A Closed-system Technology for Mechanical Isolation of High Quantities of Stromal Vascular Fraction from Fat for Immediate Clinical Use.Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open · 2023Article
- Micro-fragmented adipose tissue cellular composition varies by processing device and analytical method.Scientific reports · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
19 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundEven though the manufacturing processes of the stromal vascular fraction for clinical use are performed in compliance with the good manufacturing practices applying to advanced therapy medicinal products, specifications related to stromal vascular fraction quality remain poorly defined. We analyzed stromal vascular fraction clinical batches from two independent good manufacturing practices-compliant manufacturing facilities, the Swiss Stem Cell Foundation (SSCF) and Marseille University Hospitals (AP-HM), with the goal of defining appropriate and harmonized release acceptance criteria.
methodsThis retrospective analysis reviewed the biological characteristics of 364 batches of clinical-grade stromal vascular fraction. Collected data included cell viability, recovery yield, cell subset distribution of stromal vascular fraction, and microbiological quality.
resultsStromal vascular fraction from SSCF cohort demonstrated a higher viability (89.33% ± 4.30%) and recovery yield (2.54 × 10
conclusionsBoth centers agreed that a good manufacturing practices-compliant stromal vascular fraction batch should exert a viability equal or superior to 80%, a minimum recovery yield of 1.50 × 10
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.