Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34210320›Full record

ArticleBMC medical informatics and decision making2021

Patient similarity analytics for explainable clinical risk prediction.

Hao Sen Andrew Fang, Ngiap Chuan Tan, Wei Ying Tan, Ronald Wihal Oei, Mong Li Lee, Wynne Hsu

2 registry-linked trialsAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical informatics and decision making, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06607497 naactive not recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

Better Risk Perception Via Patient Similarity to Control Hyperglycemia and Sustained by Telemonitoring

TypeinterventionalSponsorSingHealth PolyclinicsRan2024 to 2026Enrolled360ConditionsDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2ArmsIntervention using an AI enabled risk communication tool (PERDICT.AI), Telemonitoring with Primary Tech Enhanced Care (PTEC-DM)
NCT06837428 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

Peer Comparison-based Risk Communication (PRICOM): A Study Protocol to Evaluate the Feasibility of Delivering a Risk Communication Intervention in the Primary Care Setting for Adults With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus

TypeinterventionalSponsorSingHealth PolyclinicsRan2023 to 2024Enrolled40ConditionsDiabetes Type 2ArmsPeer comparison-based Risk Communication (PRICOM)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. A Comparative Analysis of Patient Similarity Measures for Outcome Prediction.AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science proceedings. AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science · 2025
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Hao Sen Andrew FangSingHealth Polyclinics, SingHealth, 167, Jalan Bukit Merah, Connection One, Tower 5, #15-10, Singapore, P.O. 150167, Singapore. andrew.fang.h.s@singhealth.com.sg.
Ngiap Chuan TanSingHealth Polyclinics, SingHealth, 167, Jalan Bukit Merah, Connection One, Tower 5, #15-10, Singapore, P.O. 150167, Singapore.
Wei Ying TanInstitute of Data Science, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.
Ronald Wihal OeiInstitute of Data Science, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.
Mong Li LeeInstitute of Data Science, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.
Wynne HsuInstitute of Data Science, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundClinical risk prediction models (CRPMs) use patient characteristics to estimate the probability of having or developing a particular disease and/or outcome. While CRPMs are gaining in popularity, they have yet to be widely adopted in clinical practice. The lack of explainability and interpretability has limited their utility. Explainability is the extent of which a model's prediction process can be described. Interpretability is the degree to which a user can understand the predictions made by a model.

methodsThe study aimed to demonstrate utility of patient similarity analytics in developing an explainable and interpretable CRPM. Data was extracted from the electronic medical records of patients with type-2 diabetes mellitus, hypertension and dyslipidaemia in a Singapore public primary care clinic. We used modified K-nearest neighbour which incorporated expert input, to develop a patient similarity model on this real-world training dataset (n = 7,041) and validated it on a testing dataset (n = 3,018). The results were compared using logistic regression, random forest (RF) and support vector machine (SVM) models from the same dataset. The patient similarity model was then implemented in a prototype system to demonstrate the identification, explainability and interpretability of similar patients and the prediction process.

resultsThe patient similarity model (AUROC = 0.718) was comparable to the logistic regression (AUROC = 0.695), RF (AUROC = 0.764) and SVM models (AUROC = 0.766). We packaged the patient similarity model in a prototype web application. A proof of concept demonstrated how the application provided both quantitative and qualitative information, in the form of patient narratives. This information was used to better inform and influence clinical decision-making, such as getting a patient to agree to start insulin therapy.

conclusionsPatient similarity analytics is a feasible approach to develop an explainable and interpretable CRPM. While the approach is generalizable, it can be used to develop locally relevant information, based on the database it searches. Ultimately, such an approach can generate a more informative CRPMs which can be deployed as part of clinical decision support tools to better facilitate shared decision-making in clinical practice.

Indexed as

Clinical Decision-MakingElectronic Health RecordsHumansLogistic ModelsSingaporeSupport Vector MachineClinical decision support toolExplainable artificial intelligenceInterpretablePatient similarityPrediction models

Identifiers

PMID34210320
PMCPMC8247104

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.