ArticleBMC medical informatics and decision making2021
Patient similarity analytics for explainable clinical risk prediction.
Article in BMC medical informatics and decision making, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Better Risk Perception Via Patient Similarity to Control Hyperglycemia and Sustained by Telemonitoring
Peer Comparison-based Risk Communication (PRICOM): A Study Protocol to Evaluate the Feasibility of Delivering a Risk Communication Intervention in the Primary Care Setting for Adults With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed.
- Clinically-applicable prediction of hospital stay and patient similarity retrieval in paediatric cardiology using machine learning.Nature communications · 2026Article
- Reducing Emergency Diagnostic Uncertainty with TRACE: Triage and Risk Assessment via Cost Estimation.The western journal of emergency medicine · 2026Article
- An interpretable computational phenotyping pipeline for adult autism using routine electronic health records.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2026Article
- SMART: a new patient similarity estimation framework for enhanced predictive modeling in acute kidney injury.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2026Article
- Improving Hospital Length of Stay Prediction through Heterogeneous Data Integration from MIMIC-III Records.Research square · 2025Article
- Importance of Health Economics and Outcomes Research in the Product Lifecycle.Pharmaceutical medicine · 2025Review
- Human-centered design of a health recommender system for orthopaedic shoulder treatment.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2025Article
- Article
- Article
- A Comparative Analysis of Patient Similarity Measures for Outcome Prediction.AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science proceedings. AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science · 2025Article
- Identifications of Similarity Metrics for Patients With Cancer: Protocol for a Scoping Review.JMIR research protocols · 2024Article
- Constructing a Clinical Patient Similarity Network of Gastric Cancer.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Human-centered Design of a Health Recommender System for Orthopaedic Shoulder Treatment.Research square · 2024Article
- Automated generation of comparator patients in the electronic medical record.Learning health systems · 2024Article
- Decision Support for Oropharyngeal Cancer Patients Based on Data-Driven Similarity Metrics for Medical Case Comparison.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundClinical risk prediction models (CRPMs) use patient characteristics to estimate the probability of having or developing a particular disease and/or outcome. While CRPMs are gaining in popularity, they have yet to be widely adopted in clinical practice. The lack of explainability and interpretability has limited their utility. Explainability is the extent of which a model's prediction process can be described. Interpretability is the degree to which a user can understand the predictions made by a model.
methodsThe study aimed to demonstrate utility of patient similarity analytics in developing an explainable and interpretable CRPM. Data was extracted from the electronic medical records of patients with type-2 diabetes mellitus, hypertension and dyslipidaemia in a Singapore public primary care clinic. We used modified K-nearest neighbour which incorporated expert input, to develop a patient similarity model on this real-world training dataset (n = 7,041) and validated it on a testing dataset (n = 3,018). The results were compared using logistic regression, random forest (RF) and support vector machine (SVM) models from the same dataset. The patient similarity model was then implemented in a prototype system to demonstrate the identification, explainability and interpretability of similar patients and the prediction process.
resultsThe patient similarity model (AUROC = 0.718) was comparable to the logistic regression (AUROC = 0.695), RF (AUROC = 0.764) and SVM models (AUROC = 0.766). We packaged the patient similarity model in a prototype web application. A proof of concept demonstrated how the application provided both quantitative and qualitative information, in the form of patient narratives. This information was used to better inform and influence clinical decision-making, such as getting a patient to agree to start insulin therapy.
conclusionsPatient similarity analytics is a feasible approach to develop an explainable and interpretable CRPM. While the approach is generalizable, it can be used to develop locally relevant information, based on the database it searches. Ultimately, such an approach can generate a more informative CRPMs which can be deployed as part of clinical decision support tools to better facilitate shared decision-making in clinical practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.