ArticleBMC medical informatics and decision making2021
Supporting the classification of patients in public hospitals in Chile by designing, deploying and validating a system based on natural language processing.
Article in BMC medical informatics and decision making, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.
- Clinical-ShiftEval: a framework for simulating and evaluating model adaptation in dynamic clinical NLP tasks.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2026Article
- Systematic literature review and narrative synthesis of the use of natural language processing to triage outpatient referrals.Frontiers in health services · 2026Review
- NLP modeling recommendations for restricted data availability in clinical settings.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2025Article
- Demystifying the Role of Natural Language Processing (NLP) in Smart City Applications: Background, Motivation, Recent Advances, and Future Research Directions.Wireless personal communications · 2023Review
- Pneumonia and Pulmonary Thromboembolism Classification Using Electronic Health Records.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Year 2021: COVID-19, Information Extraction and BERTization among the Hottest Topics in Medical Natural Language Processing.Yearbook of medical informatics · 2022Article
- Training and intrinsic evaluation of lightweight word embeddings for the clinical domain in Spanish.Frontiers in artificial intelligence · 2022Article
- Correction to: Supporting the classifcation of patients in public hospitals in Chile by designing, deploying and validating a system based on natural language processing.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundIn Chile, a patient needing a specialty consultation or surgery has to first be referred by a general practitioner, then placed on a waiting list. The Explicit Health Guarantees (GES in Spanish) ensures, by law, the maximum time to solve 85 health problems. Usually, a health professional manually verifies if each referral, written in natural language, corresponds or not to a GES-covered disease. An error in this classification is catastrophic for patients, as it puts them on a non-prioritized waiting list, characterized by prolonged waiting times.
methodsTo support the manual process, we developed and deployed a system that automatically classifies referrals as GES-covered or not using historical data. Our system is based on word embeddings specially trained for clinical text produced in Chile. We used a vector representation of the reason for referral and patient's age as features for training machine learning models using human-labeled historical data. We constructed a ground truth dataset combining classifications made by three healthcare experts, which was used to validate our results.
resultsThe best performing model over ground truth reached an AUC score of 0.94, with a weighted F1-score of 0.85 (0.87 in precision and 0.86 in recall). During seven months of continuous and voluntary use, the system has amended 87 patient misclassifications.
conclusionThis system is a result of a collaboration between technical and clinical experts, and the design of the classifier was custom-tailored for a hospital's clinical workflow, which encouraged the voluntary use of the platform. Our solution can be easily expanded across other hospitals since the registry is uniform in Chile.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.