Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34210271›Full record

ArticleBMC family practice2021

E-prescribing and access to prescription medicines during lockdown: experience of patients in Aotearoa/New Zealand.

Fiona Imlach, Eileen McKinlay, Jonathan Kennedy, Caroline Morris, Megan Pledger, Jacqueline Cumming, Karen McBride-Henry

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC family practice, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
3.9field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Environmental Impact and Provider Satisfaction Associated with ePrescriptions in Otolaryngology: A Quality Improvement Study.Journal of otolaryngology - head & neck surgery = Le Journal d'oto-rhino-laryngologie et de chirurgie cervico-faciale
    Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Fiona ImlachHealth Services Research Centre, Victoria University of Wellington, P.O. Box 600, Wellington, 6011, New Zealand.
Eileen McKinlayDepartment of Primary Health Care and General Practice, University of Otago Wellington, PO Box 7343, Newtown, 6021, New Zealand.
Jonathan KennedyDepartment of Primary Health Care and General Practice, University of Otago Wellington, PO Box 7343, Newtown, 6021, New Zealand.
Caroline MorrisDepartment of Primary Health Care and General Practice, University of Otago Wellington, PO Box 7343, Newtown, 6021, New Zealand.
Megan PledgerHealth Services Research Centre, Victoria University of Wellington, P.O. Box 600, Wellington, 6011, New Zealand.
Jacqueline CummingHealth Services Research Centre, Victoria University of Wellington, P.O. Box 600, Wellington, 6011, New Zealand.
Karen McBride-HenrySchool of Nursing, Midwifery, and Health Practice, Victoria University of Wellington, P.O. Box 600, Wellington, 6011, New Zealand. karen.mcbride-henry@vuw.ac.nz.
Victoria University of Wellington · NZUniversity of Otago · NZ

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHealth services internationally have been compelled to change their methods of service delivery in response to the global COVID-19 pandemic, to mitigate the spread of infection amongst health professionals and patients. In Aotearoa/New Zealand, widespread electronic delivery of prescriptions (e-prescribing) was enabled. The aim of the research was to explore patients' experiences of how lockdown, changes to prescribing and the interface between general practices and community pharmacy affected access to prescription medications.

methodThe research employed a mixed-method approach. This included an online survey (n = 1,010) and in-depth interviews with a subset of survey respondents (n = 38) during the first COVID-19 lockdown (March-May 2020). Respondents were recruited through a snowballing approach, starting with social media and email list contacts of the research team. In keeping with the approach, descriptive statistics of survey data and thematic analysis of qualitative interview and open-ended questions in survey data were combined.

resultsFor most respondents who received a prescription during lockdown, this was sent directly to the pharmacy. Most people picked up their medication from the pharmacy; home delivery of medication was rare (4%). Survey and interview respondents wanted e-prescribing to continue post-lockdown and described where things worked well and where they encountered delays in the process of acquiring prescription medication.

conclusionsE-prescribing has the potential to improve access to prescription medication and is convenient for patients. The increase in e-prescribing during lockdown highlighted how the system could be improved, through better feedback about errors, more consistency across practices and pharmacies, more proactive communication with patients, and equitable prescribing costs.

Indexed as

COVID-19Delivery of Health CareElectronic PrescribingGeneral PracticeHealth Services AccessibilityAttitude of Health PersonnelCommunicable Disease ControlCommunity Pharmacy ServicesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNew ZealandPatient PreferenceQuality ImprovementSARS-CoV-2Community pharmaciesCoronavirusGeneral practiceLockdownPandemicsPrescriptionsPrimary health care

Identifiers

PMID34210271
PMCPMC8247618
OpenAlexW3177191660

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.