Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34210186›Full record

ArticleLaboratory animals2021

Refined acquisition of high-resolution chest CTs in macaques by free breathing.

Botond Tölgyesi, Jaco Bakker, Kálmán Nagy, Lisette Meijer, Leo van Geest, Marieke A Stammes

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Laboratory animals, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 31% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Comparison of [Molecular imaging and biology · 2026
    Article
  2. Comparative Study of [Molecular imaging and biology · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Botond TölgyesiMediso Medical Imaging Systems, Hungary.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1882-4289
Jaco BakkerBiomedical Primate Research Centre, Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6670-1887
Kálmán NagyMediso Medical Imaging Systems, Hungary.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9731-4599
Lisette MeijerBiomedical Primate Research Centre, Netherlands.
Leo van GeestBiomedical Primate Research Centre, Netherlands.
Marieke A StammesBiomedical Primate Research Centre, Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4261-6535
Biomedical Primate Research Centre · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The use of medical imaging as a non-invasive or minimally invasive method to assess disease or treatment response continues to grow. A similar trend is observed in pre-clinical research, in general, and more specifically in macaques, enabling longitudinal assessment of disease in individual animals. Computed tomography (CT) is such an imaging technique used to obtain clinically applicable data. To acquire a chest CT using a cone beam tomography system, some kind of respiration control is needed. A commonly used technique for this is endotracheal intubation and mechanical ventilation. However, although routinely performed this can increase the risk of impact on welfare in comparison with non-invasive imaging. Therefore, we studied the option of retrospectively gated CTs: acquiring high resolution chest CTs in freely breathing macaques. For this, we compared 748 CTs obtained during free breathing with 881 CTs obtained with mechanical ventilation in combination with a breath-hold procedure predominantly on the appearance of misregistration artifacts. The scans were obtained during different stages of multiple experimentally induced respiratory diseases. The comparison shows that although there are still streaking artifacts present in the retrospective gated scans, the amount of shading artifacts is reduced to such a level that it possibly dominates underlying lesions, causing misdiagnosis. Our data reveal that the use of retrospective gating in high resolution CTs for macaques can be successfully applied. With the use of this technique, artifacts due to free breathing are reduced to a diagnostically appropriate level. Most importantly, this technique makes chest CTs with this instrumentation a non-invasive modality.

Indexed as

MacacaRespirationAnimalsArtifactsRetrospective StudiesTomography, X-Ray Computedchest CTnon-human primaterefinementrespiratory management

Identifiers

PMID34210186
PMCPMC8669209
OpenAlexW3175138791

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.