Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34209969›Full record

ArticleTomography (Ann Arbor, Mich.)2021

Radiological Reporting of Urgencies Related to Medical Devices: Commentary on a Possible Systematic Approach.

Andrea Contegiacomo, Marco Conti, Massimo Muciaccia, Pietro Trombatore, Michele Dezio, Emilio Lozupone, Agostino Meduri, Riccardo Marano, Luigi Natale, Riccardo Manfredi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Tomography (Ann Arbor, Mich.), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Andrea ContegiacomoFondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, 00168 Rome, Italy.
Marco ContiFondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, 00168 Rome, Italy.
Massimo MuciacciaDepartment of Diagnostic Imaging, Oncological Radiotherapy and Hematology, Università Cattolica Sacro Cuore, 20123 Milano, Italy.
Pietro TrombatoreDepartment of Diagnostic Imaging, Oncological Radiotherapy and Hematology, Università Cattolica Sacro Cuore, 20123 Milano, Italy.
Michele DezioOspedale Madonna delle Grazie, 75100 Matera, Italy.
Emilio LozuponeOspedale Vito Fazzi, 73100 Lecce, Italy.
Agostino MeduriFondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, 00168 Rome, Italy.
Riccardo MaranoFondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, 00168 Rome, Italy.
Luigi NataleFondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, 00168 Rome, Italy.
Riccardo ManfrediFondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, 00168 Rome, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Most medical devices are routinely recognized on radiological images and described as normal findings in the radiological report, but sometimes they can cause patient access to the emergency department. Multiple possible complications have been described and most of them require prompt recognition by radiologists for proper clinical management. This commentary proposes a systematic approach to radiological reporting of the most common emergent complications related to medical devices with the intent to avoid the omission of important findings in the final radiological report.

Indexed as

RadiologyEmergency Service, HospitalHumansRadiographyRadiologistscomplicationCTemergency departmentmedical deviceradiology checklistX-ray

Identifiers

PMID34209969
PMCPMC8293404

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.