Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34209853›Full record

ArticlePolymers2021

Fabrication of 3D-Printed Interpenetrating Hydrogel Scaffolds for Promoting Chondrogenic Differentiation.

Jian Guan, Fu-Zhen Yuan, Zi-Mu Mao, Hai-Lin Zhu, Lin Lin, Harry Huimin Chen, Jia-Kuo Yu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Polymers, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Bioactive materials · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Applications of 3D printing in aging.International journal of bioprinting · 2023
    Review
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Jian GuanBeijing Key Laboratory of Sports Injuries, Sports Medicine Department, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing 100191, China.ORCID 0000-0001-7982-3058
Fu-Zhen YuanBeijing Key Laboratory of Sports Injuries, Sports Medicine Department, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing 100191, China.
Zi-Mu MaoBeijing Key Laboratory of Sports Injuries, Sports Medicine Department, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing 100191, China.
Hai-Lin ZhuSinoBioPrint (Shanghai) Biotech Ltd., 23 Building, 1188 Lianhang Road, Minhang District, Shanghai 201112, China.
Lin LinBeijing Key Laboratory of Sports Injuries, Sports Medicine Department, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing 100191, China.
Harry Huimin ChenSinoBioPrint (Shanghai) Biotech Ltd., 23 Building, 1188 Lianhang Road, Minhang District, Shanghai 201112, China.
Jia-Kuo YuBeijing Key Laboratory of Sports Injuries, Sports Medicine Department, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing 100191, China.

Funding

Jia-kuo Yu 51773004Xing Wang 51973226
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The limited self-healing ability of cartilage necessitates the application of alternative tissue engineering strategies for repairing the damaged tissue and restoring its normal function. Compared to conventional tissue engineering strategies, three-dimensional (3D) printing offers a greater potential for developing tissue-engineered scaffolds. Herein, we prepared a novel photocrosslinked printable cartilage ink comprising of polyethylene glycol diacrylate (PEGDA), gelatin methacryloyl (GelMA), and chondroitin sulfate methacrylate (CSMA). The PEGDA-GelMA-CSMA scaffolds possessed favorable compressive elastic modulus and degradation rate. In vitro experiments showed good adhesion, proliferation, and F-actin and chondrogenic differentiation of bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells (BMSCs) on the scaffolds. When the CSMA concentration was increased, the compressive elastic modulus, GAG production, and expression of F-actin and cartilage-specific genes (COL2, ACAN, SOX9, PRG4) were significantly improved while the osteogenic marker genes of COL1 and ALP were decreased. The findings of the study indicate that the 3D-printed PEGDA-GelMA-CSMA scaffolds possessed not only adequate mechanical strength but also maintained a suitable 3D microenvironment for differentiation, proliferation, and extracellular matrix production of BMSCs, which suggested this customizable 3D-printed PEGDA-GelMA-CSMA scaffold may have great potential for cartilage repair and regeneration in vivo.

Indexed as

3D printingcartilage repairCSMAGelMAhydrogel scaffold

Identifiers

PMID34209853
PMCPMC8271621

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.