Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34209493›Full record

ReviewCancers2021

Targeted Cancer Therapy Using Compounds Activated by Light.

Petra Dunkel, Janez Ilaš

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cancers, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Control of Gemcitabine Activity With Blue and Red Light.Chemistry (Weinheim an der Bergstrasse, Germany) · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Tumor-Selective and Chemical Activation Strategies for Nitrogen Mustard Prodrugs.Chemistry (Weinheim an der Bergstrasse, Germany) · 2026
    Review
  4. Review
  5. ACS pharmacology & translational science · 2025
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Petra DunkelDepartment of Organic Chemistry, Semmelweis University, 1092 Budapest, Hungary.ORCID 0000-0001-5445-8357
Janez IlašFaculty of Pharmacy, University of Ljubljana, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia.ORCID 0000-0002-0124-0474

Funding

Javna Agencija za Raziskovalno Dejavnost RS N1-0172Javna Agencija za Raziskovalno Dejavnost RS P1-0208National Research, Development and Innovation Office P1-020National Research, Development and Innovation Office SNN 135825
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cancer chemotherapy is affected by a modest selectivity and toxic side effects of pharmacological interventions. Among novel approaches to overcome this limitation and to bring to therapy more potent and selective agents is the use of light for selective activation of anticancer compounds. In this review, we focus on the anticancer applications of two light-activated approaches still in the experimental phase: photoremovable protecting groups ("photocages") and photoswitches. We describe the structural considerations behind the development of novel compounds and the plethora of assays used to confirm whether the photochemical and pharmacological properties are meeting the stringent criteria for an efficient in vivo light-dependent activation. Despite its immense potential, light activation brings many challenges, and the complexity of the task is very demanding. Currently, we are still deeply in the phase of pharmacological tools, but the vivid research and rapid development bring the light of hope for potential clinical use.

Indexed as

azobenzeneslight-activatable materialsphotocagesphotopharmacologyphotoresponsive drug delivery systemsphotoswitches

Identifiers

PMID34209493
PMCPMC8269035

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.