Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34209410›Full record

ArticleMicromachines2021

A New Predictive Technology for Perinatal Stem Cell Isolation Suited for Cell Therapy Approaches.

Silvia Zia, Giulia Martini, Valeria Pizzuti, Alessia Maggio, Giuliana Simonazzi, Pierluigi Reschiglian, Laura Bonsi, Francesco Alviano, Barbara Roda, Andrea Zattoni

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Micromachines, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Silvia ZiaStem Sel srl., 40127 Bologna, Italy.
Giulia MartiniUnit of Histology, Department of Experimental, Diagnostic and Specialty Medicine, Embryology and Applied Biology, University of Bologna, 40126 Bologna, Italy.
Valeria PizzutiUnit of Histology, Department of Experimental, Diagnostic and Specialty Medicine, Embryology and Applied Biology, University of Bologna, 40126 Bologna, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-5591-7663
Alessia MaggioUnit of Histology, Department of Experimental, Diagnostic and Specialty Medicine, Embryology and Applied Biology, University of Bologna, 40126 Bologna, Italy.
Giuliana SimonazziObstetric Unit, Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, Policlinico St. Orsola-Malpighi, University of Bologna, 40126 Bologna, Italy.
Pierluigi ReschiglianStem Sel srl., 40127 Bologna, Italy.
Laura BonsiUnit of Histology, Department of Experimental, Diagnostic and Specialty Medicine, Embryology and Applied Biology, University of Bologna, 40126 Bologna, Italy.
Francesco AlvianoUnit of Histology, Department of Experimental, Diagnostic and Specialty Medicine, Embryology and Applied Biology, University of Bologna, 40126 Bologna, Italy.
Barbara RodaStem Sel srl., 40127 Bologna, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-1060-2921
Andrea ZattoniStem Sel srl., 40127 Bologna, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The use of stem cells for regenerative applications and immunomodulatory effect is increasing. Amniotic epithelial cells (AECs) possess embryonic-like proliferation ability and multipotent differentiation potential. Despite the simple isolation procedure, inter-individual variability and different isolation steps can cause differences in isolation yield and cell proliferation ability, compromising reproducibility observations among centers and further applications. We investigated the use of a new technology as a diagnostic tool for quality control on stem cell isolation. The instrument label-free separates cells based on their physical characteristics and, thanks to a micro-camera, generates a live fractogram, the fingerprint of the sample. Eight amniotic membranes were processed by trypsin enzymatic treatment and immediately analysed. Two types of profile were generated: a monomodal and a bimodal curve. The first one represented the unsuccessful isolation with all recovered cell not attaching to the plate; while for the second type, the isolation process was successful, but we discovered that only cells in the second peak were alive and resulted adherent. We optimized a Quality Control (QC) method to define the success of AEC isolation using the fractogram generated. This predictive outcome is an interesting tool for laboratories and cell banks that isolate and cryopreserve fetal annex stem cells for research and future clinical applications.

Indexed as

amniotic epithelial cellsdiagnostic toolfetal stem cellsisolation protocollabel-free sortingquality control

Identifiers

PMID34209410
PMCPMC8305015

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.