Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34209399›Full record

ArticleMembranes2021

COMTOP: Protein Residue-Residue Contact Prediction through Mixed Integer Linear Optimization.

Md Selim Reza, Huiling Zhang, Md Tofazzal Hossain, Langxi Jin, Shengzhong Feng, Yanjie Wei

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Membranes, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Md Selim RezaSchool of Computer Science and Technology, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China.
Huiling ZhangSchool of Computer Science and Technology, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China.
Md Tofazzal HossainSchool of Computer Science and Technology, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China.
Langxi JinDepartment of Computer Science and Technology, School of Computer Science and Technology, Harbin University of Science and Technology, 52 Xuefu Road, Nangang District, Harbin 150080, China.
Shengzhong FengCentre for High Performance Computing, Joint Engineering Research Center for Health Big Data Intelligent Analysis Technology, Shenzhen Institutes of Advanced Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shenzhen 518055, China.
Yanjie WeiSchool of Computer Science and Technology, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China.

Funding

CAS Key Lab 2011DP173015 (YW)National Key Research and Development Program of China 2018YFB0204403Shenzhen Basic Research Fund JCYJ20180507182818013, JCYJ20200109114818703, RCYX2020071411473419Strategic Priority CAS Project XDB38000000 (Y.W.)
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Protein contact prediction helps reconstruct the tertiary structure that greatly determines a protein's function; therefore, contact prediction from the sequence is an important problem. Recently there has been exciting progress on this problem, but many of the existing methods are still low quality of prediction accuracy. In this paper, we present a new mixed integer linear programming (MILP)-based consensus method: a Consensus scheme based On a Mixed integer linear opTimization method for prOtein contact Prediction (COMTOP). The MILP-based consensus method combines the strengths of seven selected protein contact prediction methods, including CCMpred, EVfold, DeepCov, NNcon, PconsC4, plmDCA, and PSICOV, by optimizing the number of correctly predicted contacts and achieving a better prediction accuracy. The proposed hybrid protein residue-residue contact prediction scheme was tested in four independent test sets. For 239 highly non-redundant proteins, the method showed a prediction accuracy of 59.68%, 70.79%, 78.86%, 89.04%, 94.51%, and 97.35% for top-5L, top-3L, top-2L, top-L, top-L/2, and top-L/5 contacts, respectively. When tested on the CASP13 and CASP14 test sets, the proposed method obtained accuracies of 75.91% and 77.49% for top-L/5 predictions, respectively. COMTOP was further tested on 57 non-redundant ɑ-helical transmembrane proteins and achieved prediction accuracies of 64.34% and 73.91% for top-L/2 and top-L/5 predictions, respectively. For all test datasets, the improvement of COMTOP in accuracy over the seven individual methods increased with the increasing number of predicted contacts. For example, COMTOP performed much better for large number of contact predictions (such as top-5L and top-3L) than for small number of contact predictions such as top-L/2 and top-L/5. The results and analysis demonstrate that COMTOP can significantly improve the performance of the individual methods; therefore, COMTOP is more robust against different types of test sets. COMTOP also showed better/comparable predictions when compared with the state-of-the-art predictors.

Indexed as

contact predictionmachine learningmixed integer linear programmingprotein residue–residue contactprotein sequence

Identifiers

PMID34209399
PMCPMC8305966

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.