Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34209372›Full record

ArticlePolymers2021

Relationship between FDM 3D Printing Parameters Study: Parameter Optimization for Lower Defects.

Patrich Ferretti, Christian Leon-Cardenas, Gian Maria Santi, Merve Sali, Elisa Ciotti, Leonardo Frizziero, Giampiero Donnici, Alfredo Liverani

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Polymers, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05700526 (Customized Bone Allografts by Virtual Surgical Planning and 3D-printing for Correcting Musculoskeletal Deformities in Children), which is not on this map. Cited by 35 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05700526 naenrolling by invitationnot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

Customized Bone Allografts by Virtual Surgical Planning and 3D-printing for Correcting Musculoskeletal Deformities in Children

TypeinterventionalSponsorIstituto Ortopedico RizzoliRan2022 to 2027Enrolled42ConditionsMusculoskeletal Deformity, Musculoskeletal Diseases, Musculoskeletal DisorderArmsPlanning of multiplanar and/or multifocal osteotomies in children by using VSP, PSIs and customized structural bone allograft, Routine preparation of bone graft according to standard protocols, Preparation of bone graft with virtual bone-matching and GSIs, Corrective osteotomy
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Online Measurement for Parameter Discovery in Fused Filament Fabrication.Integrating materials and manufacturing innovation · 2024
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Patrich FerrettiDepartment of Industrial Engineering, ALMA MATER STUDIORUM University of Bologna, I-40136 Bologna, Italy.
Christian Leon-CardenasDepartment of Industrial Engineering, ALMA MATER STUDIORUM University of Bologna, I-40136 Bologna, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-6430-4615
Gian Maria SantiDepartment of Industrial Engineering, ALMA MATER STUDIORUM University of Bologna, I-40136 Bologna, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-7966-6002
Merve SaliDepartment of Industrial Engineering, ALMA MATER STUDIORUM University of Bologna, I-40136 Bologna, Italy.
Elisa CiottiDepartment of Industrial Engineering, ALMA MATER STUDIORUM University of Bologna, I-40136 Bologna, Italy.
Leonardo FrizzieroDepartment of Industrial Engineering, ALMA MATER STUDIORUM University of Bologna, I-40136 Bologna, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-4809-3536
Giampiero DonniciDepartment of Industrial Engineering, ALMA MATER STUDIORUM University of Bologna, I-40136 Bologna, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-6666-1309
Alfredo LiveraniDepartment of Industrial Engineering, ALMA MATER STUDIORUM University of Bologna, I-40136 Bologna, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-3255-9381

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Technology evolution and wide research attention on 3D printing efficiency and processes have given the prompt need to reach an understanding about each technique's prowess to deliver superior quality levels whilst showing an economical and process viability to become mainstream. Studies in the field have struggled to predict the singularities that arise during most Fused Deposition Modeling (FDM) practices; therefore, diverse individual description of the parameters have been performed, but a relationship study between them has not yet assessed. The proposed study lays the main defects caused by a selection of printing parameters which might vary layer slicing, then influencing the defect rate. Subsequently, the chosen technique for optimization is presented, with evidence of its application viability that suggests that a quality advance would be gathered with such. The results would help in making the FDM process become a reliable process that could also be used for industry manufacturing besides prototyping purposes.

Indexed as

defectsoptimizationoptimized FDMprinting parametersvoid occurrence

Identifiers

PMID34209372
PMCPMC8271925

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.