Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34209230›Full record

ArticlePathogens (Basel, Switzerland)2021

Predictive Value of Precision-Cut Lung Slices for the Susceptibility of Three Animal Species for SARS-CoV-2 and Validation in a Refined Hamster Model.

Nora M Gerhards, Jan B W J Cornelissen, Lucien J M van Keulen, José Harders-Westerveen, Rianka Vloet, Bregtje Smid, Stéphanie Vastenhouw, Sophie van Oort, Renate W Hakze-van der Honing, Jose L Gonzales and 7 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Natural SARS-CoV-2 infection in farmed minksFrontiers in veterinary science · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Quantitative Risk Evaluation of Adventitious Agents in Heparin.TH open : companion journal to thrombosis and haemostasis · 2023
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors.

Nora M GerhardsWageningen Bioveterinary Research, Houtribweg 39, 8221 RA Lelystad, The Netherlands.
Jan B W J CornelissenWageningen Bioveterinary Research, Houtribweg 39, 8221 RA Lelystad, The Netherlands.
Lucien J M van KeulenWageningen Bioveterinary Research, Houtribweg 39, 8221 RA Lelystad, The Netherlands.
José Harders-WesterveenWageningen Bioveterinary Research, Houtribweg 39, 8221 RA Lelystad, The Netherlands.
Rianka VloetWageningen Bioveterinary Research, Houtribweg 39, 8221 RA Lelystad, The Netherlands.
Bregtje SmidWageningen Bioveterinary Research, Houtribweg 39, 8221 RA Lelystad, The Netherlands.
Stéphanie VastenhouwWageningen Bioveterinary Research, Houtribweg 39, 8221 RA Lelystad, The Netherlands.
Sophie van OortWageningen Bioveterinary Research, Houtribweg 39, 8221 RA Lelystad, The Netherlands.
Renate W Hakze-van der HoningWageningen Bioveterinary Research, Houtribweg 39, 8221 RA Lelystad, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-7621-2729
Jose L GonzalesWageningen Bioveterinary Research, Houtribweg 39, 8221 RA Lelystad, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-7889-5380
Norbert Stockhofe-ZurwiedenWageningen Bioveterinary Research, Houtribweg 39, 8221 RA Lelystad, The Netherlands.
Rineke de JongWageningen Bioveterinary Research, Houtribweg 39, 8221 RA Lelystad, The Netherlands.
Wim H M van der PoelWageningen Bioveterinary Research, Houtribweg 39, 8221 RA Lelystad, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-7498-8002
Sandra VremanWageningen Bioveterinary Research, Houtribweg 39, 8221 RA Lelystad, The Netherlands.
Jeroen KortekaasWageningen Bioveterinary Research, Houtribweg 39, 8221 RA Lelystad, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-0329-0176
Paul J Wichgers SchreurWageningen Bioveterinary Research, Houtribweg 39, 8221 RA Lelystad, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-9790-2438
Nadia OreshkovaWageningen Bioveterinary Research, Houtribweg 39, 8221 RA Lelystad, The Netherlands.

Funding

Coalition for Epidemic Preparedness Innovations not applicableMinisterie van Landbouw, Natuur en Voedselkwaliteit KB-21-006-036Ministerie van Landbouw, Natuur en Voedselkwaliteit WOT-01-003-083
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In assessing species susceptibility for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), and in the search for an appropriate animal model, multiple research groups around the world inoculated a broad range of animal species using various SARS-CoV-2 strains, doses and administration routes. Although in silico analyses based on receptor binding and diverse in vitro cell cultures were valuable, exact prediction of species susceptibility based on these tools proved challenging. Here, we assessed whether precision-cut lung slices (PCLS) could facilitate the selection of animal models, thereby reducing animal experimentation. Pig, hamster and cat PCLS were incubated with SARS-CoV-2 and virus replication was followed over time. Virus replicated efficiently in PCLS from hamsters and cats, while no evidence of replication was obtained for pig PCLS. These data corroborate the findings of many research groups that have investigated the susceptibility of hamsters, pigs and cats towards infection with SARS-CoV-2. Our findings suggest that PCLS can be used as convenient tool for the screening of different animal species for sensitivity to newly emerged viruses. To validate our results obtained in PCLS, we employed the hamster model. Hamsters were inoculated with SARS-CoV-2 via the intranasal route. Susceptibility to infection was evaluated by body weight loss, viral loads in oropharyngeal swabs and respiratory tissues and lung pathology. The broadly used hamster model was further refined by including activity tracking of the hamsters by an activity wheel as a very robust and sensitive parameter for clinical health. In addition, to facilitate the quantification of pathology in the lungs, we devised a semi-quantitative scoring system for evaluating the degree of histological changes in the lungs. The inclusion of these additional parameters refined and enriched the hamster model, allowing for the generation of more data from a single experiment.

Indexed as

activityhamster modelhistology scoresprecision-cut lung slicesSARS-CoV-2

Identifiers

PMID34209230
PMCPMC8308566

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.