Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34209221›Full record

ArticleCancers2021

Comparison of Surgical Outcomes between Robotic Transaxillary and Conventional Open Thyroidectomy in Pediatric Thyroid Cancer.

In A Lee, Kwangsoon Kim, Jin Kyong Kim, Sang-Wook Kang, Jandee Lee, Jong Ju Jeong, Kee-Hyun Nam, Woong Youn Chung

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancers, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Redo Thyroidectomy: Updated Insights.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Observational
  12. Article
  13. Breast and Thyroid Surgery in 2021 and Beyond.Journal of clinical medicine · 2022
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

In A LeeDepartment of Surgery, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Severance Hospital, Seoul 03722, Korea.ORCID 0000-0003-2739-0750
Kwangsoon KimDepartment of Surgery, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul 06591, Korea.ORCID 0000-0001-6403-6035
Jin Kyong KimDepartment of Surgery, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Severance Hospital, Seoul 03722, Korea.
Sang-Wook KangDepartment of Surgery, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Severance Hospital, Seoul 03722, Korea.ORCID 0000-0001-5355-833X
Jandee LeeDepartment of Surgery, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Severance Hospital, Seoul 03722, Korea.
Jong Ju JeongDepartment of Surgery, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Severance Hospital, Seoul 03722, Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-4155-6035
Kee-Hyun NamDepartment of Surgery, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Severance Hospital, Seoul 03722, Korea.
Woong Youn ChungDepartment of Surgery, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Severance Hospital, Seoul 03722, Korea.
Yonsei University · KRCatholic University of Korea · KR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Thyroid cancer in children is very uncommon. For pediatric thyroid cancer, robotic surgery has served as a minimally invasive surgical alternative to conventional open surgery. Our study aimed to evaluate the results of robotic versus open surgical treatment for patients with thyroid cancer younger than 20 years of age at the time of diagnosis. This retrospective review included 161 pediatric patients who underwent robotic transaxillary or conventional open thyroidectomy at our institution from 2008 to 2019. Of these patients, 99 comprised the robotic group and 62 the open group. Patient demographics, surgical outcomes, and disease-free survival rates were compared between the two groups. Patients in the open group were more likely to have advanced stage diseases with a larger tumor size and higher tumor-node-metastasis stage than those in the robotic group. Operation time and follow-up period were similar in both groups. Patients in the robotic group had a lower rate of postoperative complications and a shorter length of hospital stay, but they also had a lower average number of retrieved central lymph nodes. However, there were no significant between group differences in recurrence rates and disease-free survival. In the hands of an experienced surgeon, robotic thyroidectomy is a feasible and safe option for pediatric patients.

Indexed as

conventional open thyroidectomypediatric thyroid cancerrobotic trans-axillary thyroidectomy

Identifiers

PMID34209221
PMCPMC8269192
OpenAlexW3177479700

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.