Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34209202›Full record

Trial reportInternational journal of molecular sciences2021

Procoagulant and Antimicrobial Effects of Chitosan in Wound Healing.

Chih-Hsin Wang, Juin-Hong Cherng, Chuan-Chieh Liu, Tong-Jing Fang, Zhi-Jie Hong, Shu-Jen Chang, Gang-Yi Fan, Sheng-Der Hsu

Open access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in International journal of molecular sciences, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 39 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
39citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
6.2field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

39 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 77 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Targeting Oxidative and Immune Dysregulation in Wound Healing via Gold Nanoparticle Conjugate Chitosan.FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Chih-Hsin WangDivision of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Surgery, Tri-Service General Hospital, National Defense Medical Center, Taipei 114, Taiwan.
Juin-Hong CherngDepartment and Graduate Institute of Biology and Anatomy, National Defense Medical Center, Taipei 114, Taiwan.ORCID 0000-0002-7722-6134
Chuan-Chieh LiuDepartment of Cardiology, Cardinal Tien Hospital, New Taipei City 231, Taiwan.
Tong-Jing FangDepartment of Physiology and Biophysics, Graduate Institute of Physiology, National Defense Medical Center, Taipei 114, Taiwan.
Zhi-Jie HongDivision of Traumatology, Department of Surgery, Tri-Service General Hospital, National Defense Medical Center, Taipei 114, Taiwan.
Shu-Jen ChangDivision of Rheumatology/Immunology/Allergy, Department of Internal Medicine, Tri-Service General Hospital, National Defense Medical Center, Taipei 114, Taiwan.ORCID 0000-0001-6203-057X
Gang-Yi FanLaboratory of Adult Stem Cell and Tissue Regeneration, National Defense Medical Center, Taipei 114, Taiwan.
Sheng-Der HsuDivision of Traumatology, Department of Surgery, Tri-Service General Hospital, National Defense Medical Center, Taipei 114, Taiwan.ORCID 0000-0001-9698-8954
Tri-Service General Hospital · TWNational Defense Medical Center · TWCardinal Tien Hospital · TW

Funding

Ministry of National Defense-Medical Affairs Bureau MAB-109-079; MND-MAB-110-046; MND-MAB-110-074Tri-Service General Hospital program TSGH-D109141; TSGH-E-109233
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Chitosan, a polysaccharide derived from chitin, has excellent wound healing properties, including intrinsic antimicrobial and hemostatic activities. This study investigated the effectiveness of chitosan dressing and compared it with that of regular gauze dressing in controlling clinically surgical bleeding wounds and profiled the community structure of the microbiota affected by these treatments. The dressings were evaluated based on biocompatibility, blood coagulation factors in rat, as well as antimicrobial and procoagulant activities, and the microbial phylogenetic profile in patients with abdominal surgical wounds. The chitosan dressing exhibited a uniformly fibrous morphology with a large surface area and good biocompatibility. Compared to regular gauze dressing, the chitosan dressing accelerated platelet aggregation, indicated by the lower ratio of prothrombin time and activated partial thromboplastin time, and had outstanding blood absorption ability. Adenosine triphosphate assay results revealed that the chitosan dressing inhibited bacterial growth up to 8 d post-surgery. Moreover, 16S rRNA-based sequencing revealed that the chitosan dressing effectively protected the wound from microbial infection and promoted the growth of probiotic microbes, thereby improving skin immunity and promoting wound healing. Our findings suggest that chitosan dressing is an effective antimicrobial and procoagulant and promotes wound repair by providing a suitable environment for beneficial microbiota.

Indexed as

BandagesAnti-Bacterial AgentsCell LineChitosanHemostaticsHumansWound HealingAnti-Bacterial AgentsChitosanHemostaticsantimicrobialchitosanhemostasismicrobiotaprocoagulantwound dressing

Identifiers

PMID34209202
PMCPMC8269297
OpenAlexW3175377719

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.