Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34209172›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of molecular sciences2021

Molecular Landscape of Vulvar Squamous Cell Carcinoma.

Nuria Carreras-Dieguez, José Guerrero, Maria Teresa Rodrigo-Calvo, Inmaculada Ribera-Cortada, Isabel Trias, Pedro Jares, Ricardo López Del Campo, Adela Saco, Meritxell Munmany, Lorena Marimon and 6 more

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of molecular sciences, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Advances in Gynecological Cancers.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Nuria Carreras-DieguezClinical Institute of Gynecology, Obstetrics, and Neonatology, Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, Universitat de Barcelona, 08036 Barcelona, Spain.
José GuerreroDepartment of Pathology, Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, Universitat de Barcelona, 08036 Barcelona, Spain.
Maria Teresa Rodrigo-CalvoDepartment of Pathology, Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, Universitat de Barcelona, 08036 Barcelona, Spain.
Inmaculada Ribera-CortadaDepartment of Pathology, Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, Universitat de Barcelona, 08036 Barcelona, Spain.
Isabel TriasDepartment of Pathology, Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, Universitat de Barcelona, 08036 Barcelona, Spain.
Pedro JaresInstitut d'Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, 08036 Barcelona, Spain.
Ricardo López Del CampoDepartment of Pathology, Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, Universitat de Barcelona, 08036 Barcelona, Spain.
Adela SacoDepartment of Pathology, Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, Universitat de Barcelona, 08036 Barcelona, Spain.
Meritxell MunmanyClinical Institute of Gynecology, Obstetrics, and Neonatology, Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, Universitat de Barcelona, 08036 Barcelona, Spain.
Lorena MarimonISGlobal, Hospital Clínic de Barcelona-Universitat de Barcelona, 08036 Barcelona, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-2943-3550
Melania FerrandoISGlobal, Hospital Clínic de Barcelona-Universitat de Barcelona, 08036 Barcelona, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-7678-7151
Naiara VegaDepartment of Pathology, Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, Universitat de Barcelona, 08036 Barcelona, Spain.
Marta Del PinoClinical Institute of Gynecology, Obstetrics, and Neonatology, Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, Universitat de Barcelona, 08036 Barcelona, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-2178-2403
Aureli TornéClinical Institute of Gynecology, Obstetrics, and Neonatology, Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, Universitat de Barcelona, 08036 Barcelona, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-4700-9507
Jaume OrdiDepartment of Pathology, Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, Universitat de Barcelona, 08036 Barcelona, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-4820-7954
Natalia RakislovaDepartment of Pathology, Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, Universitat de Barcelona, 08036 Barcelona, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-5030-3526
Hospital Clínic de Barcelona · ES

Funding

Instituto de Salud Carlos III PI20/368
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Vulvar squamous cell carcinoma (VSCC) is a rare malignancy with dual pathogenesis, Human papillomavirus (HPV)-associated and HPV-independent, with a poorly explored molecular landscape. We aimed to summarize the findings of the series analyzing molecular hallmarks of this neoplasm. In January 2021, we conducted a comprehensive literature search using Pubmed Medline and Scopus to identify publications focused on genomic profiling of VSCC. Observational studies, including both prospective and retrospective designs, evaluating molecular alterations in VSCC were deemed eligible. A total of 14 studies analyzing 749 VSCC were identified. The study series were heterogeneous in HPV testing and sequencing strategies, included small sets of tumors and cancer genes, and commonly lacked survival analysis. Only one extensive targeted next-generation sequencing-based study comprised a large cohort of 280 VSCC. The mutated genes, their number, and frequencies were highly variable between the series. Overall,

Indexed as

MutationCarcinoma, Squamous CellFemaleHumansNeoplasm ProteinsVulvar NeoplasmsNeoplasm Proteinsgenomic landscapemolecular analysisnext generation sequencingvulvar cancervulvar squamous cell carcinomawhole-exome sequencing

Identifiers

PMID34209172
PMCPMC8269046
OpenAlexW3174148319

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.