Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34209045›Full record

ArticleBrain sciences2021

Effects of Orthographic Consistency on Bilingual Reading: Human and Computer Simulation Data.

Eraldo Paulesu, Rolando Bonandrini, Laura Zapparoli, Cristina Rupani, Cristina Mapelli, Fulvia Tassini, Pietro Schenone, Gabriella Bottini, Conrad Perry, Marco Zorzi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Brain sciences, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Eraldo PaulesuPsychology Department, University of Milano-Bicocca, 20126 Milano, Italy.
Rolando BonandriniPsychology Department, University of Milano-Bicocca, 20126 Milano, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-7098-4231
Laura ZapparoliPsychology Department, University of Milano-Bicocca, 20126 Milano, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-9210-942X
Cristina RupaniPsychology Department, University of Milano-Bicocca, 20126 Milano, Italy.
Cristina MapelliSchool of Medicine and Surgery, University of Milano-Bicocca, 20126 Milano, Italy.
Fulvia TassiniCivica Scuola Interpreti e Traduttori, 20144 Milano, Italy.
Pietro SchenoneCivica Scuola Interpreti e Traduttori, 20144 Milano, Italy.
Gabriella BottiniDepartment of Brain and Behavioural Sciences, University of Pavia, 27100 Pavia, Italy.
Conrad PerryDepartment of Psychology, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide 5005, Australia.
Marco ZorziDepartment of General Psychology and Padova Neuroscience Centre, University of Padova, 35131 Padova, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-4651-6390

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

English serves as today's lingua franca, a role not eased by the inconsistency of its orthography. Indeed, monolingual readers of more consistent orthographies such as Italian or German learn to read more quickly than monolingual English readers. Here, we assessed whether long-lasting bilingualism would mitigate orthography-specific differences in reading speed and whether the order in which orthographies with a different regularity are learned matters. We studied high-proficiency Italian-English and English-Italian bilinguals, with at least 20 years of intensive daily exposure to the second language and its orthography and we simulated sequential learning of the two orthographies with the CDP++ connectionist model of reading. We found that group differences in reading speed were comparatively bigger with Italian stimuli than with English stimuli. Furthermore, only Italian bilinguals took advantage of a blocked presentation of Italian stimuli compared to when stimuli from both languages were presented in mixed order, suggesting a greater ability to keep language-specific orthographic representations segregated. These findings demonstrate orthographic constraints on bilingual reading, whereby the level of consistency of the first learned orthography affects later learning and performance on a second orthography. The computer simulations were consistent with these conclusions.

Indexed as

bilingualismCDP++languageorthographic regularityorthographyreading

Identifiers

PMID34209045
PMCPMC8301906

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.