Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34209029›Full record

ReviewDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2021

Role of Artificial Intelligence in Video Capsule Endoscopy.

Ioannis Tziortziotis, Faidon-Marios Laskaratos, Sergio Coda

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Is Panenteric PillcamDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Diagnostic Yields and Clinical Impacts of Capsule Endoscopy.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Review
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Ioannis TziortziotisEndoscopy Unit, Digestive Diseases Centre, Queen's Hospital, Barking Havering and Redbridge University Hospitals NHS Trust, Rom Valley Way, Romford, London RM7 0AG, UK.
Faidon-Marios LaskaratosEndoscopy Unit, Digestive Diseases Centre, Queen's Hospital, Barking Havering and Redbridge University Hospitals NHS Trust, Rom Valley Way, Romford, London RM7 0AG, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-8673-1837
Sergio CodaEndoscopy Unit, Digestive Diseases Centre, Queen's Hospital, Barking Havering and Redbridge University Hospitals NHS Trust, Rom Valley Way, Romford, London RM7 0AG, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Capsule endoscopy (CE) has been increasingly utilised in recent years as a minimally invasive tool to investigate the whole gastrointestinal (GI) tract and a range of capsules are currently available for evaluation of upper GI, small bowel, and lower GI pathology. Although CE is undoubtedly an invaluable test for the investigation of small bowel pathology, it presents considerable challenges and limitations, such as long and laborious reading times, risk of missing lesions, lack of bowel cleansing score and lack of locomotion. Artificial intelligence (AI) seems to be a promising tool that may help improve the performance metrics of CE, and consequently translate to better patient care. In the last decade, significant progress has been made to apply AI in the field of endoscopy, including CE. Although it is certain that AI will find soon its place in day-to-day endoscopy clinical practice, there are still some open questions and barriers limiting its widespread application. In this review, we provide some general information about AI, and outline recent advances in AI and CE, issues around implementation of AI in medical practice and potential future applications of AI-aided CE.

Indexed as

artificial intelligencecapsule endoscopydeep learning

Identifiers

PMID34209029
PMCPMC8303156

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.