Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34208849›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2021

Correlation between Primary, Secondary Stability, Bone Density, Percentage of Vital Bone Formation and Implant Size.

Vasilena Ivanova, Ivan Chenchev, Stefan Zlatev, Eitan Mijiritsky

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05499533 (Hybrid Funnel Technique vs Conventional Drill Osteotomy, a Novel Approach for Implant Site Preparation), which is not on this map. Cited by 25 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
7.1field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05499533 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

Hybrid Funnel Technique vs Conventional Drill Osteotomy, a Novel Approach for Implant Site Preparation

TypeinterventionalSponsorLuigi CanulloRan2022 to 2023Enrolled80ConditionsMissing Teeth, Edentulous Alveolar Ridge, Tooth LossArmsimplant site preparation
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 50 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Vasilena IvanovaOral Surgery Department, Faculty of Dental Medicine, Medical University-Plovdiv, 4000 Plovdiv, Bulgaria.ORCID 0000-0002-8914-2931
Ivan ChenchevCenter of Dental Implantology, Research Institute at the Medical University of Plovdiv, 4000 Plovdiv, Bulgaria.ORCID 0000-0002-8499-1619
Stefan ZlatevCAD/CAM Center of Dental Medicine, Research Institute at the Medical University of Plovdiv, 4000 Plovdiv, Bulgaria.ORCID 0000-0002-3486-6158
Eitan MijiritskyHead and Neck Maxillofacial Surgery, Department of Otoryngology, Tel-Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Tel-Aviv 699350, Israel.ORCID 0000-0002-1661-7529
Medical University Plovdiv · BGTel Aviv University · IL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThis study aims to evaluate whether there is a correlation between implant stability, bone density, vital bone formation and implant diameter and length.

methodsNinety patients were enrolled in this study. They underwent a socket preservation procedure with allograft or PRF and after 4 months, a total of 90 implants were placed. CBCT scans were assigned prior to implant placement in order to assess the bone density. During the surgical re-entry, a bone biopsy was harvested with a trephine drill. Immediately after implant insertion, the primary stability was measured. The secondary stability was measured 4 months after implant placement.

resultsPrimary stability showed a significant positive linear correlation with bone density (r = 0.471,

conclusionsThe study revealed a high correlation between primary and secondary implant stability, and bone density, as well as with the percentage of vital bone formation. Implant length and diameter revealed no linear correlation with the implant stability.

Indexed as

Bone DensityOsteogenesisHumansProstheses and Implantsbone densitydental implantsimplant diameterimplant lengthprimary stabilitysecondary stability

Identifiers

PMID34208849
PMCPMC8297224
OpenAlexW3174395549

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.