Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34208773›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical medicine2021

A Double-Blind Crossover RCT Analyzing Technical and Clinical Performance of Monolithic ZrO

Aiste Gintaute, Karin Weber, Nicola U Zitzmann, Urs Brägger, Marco Ferrari, Tim Joda

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04029025 (Complete Digital Workflows for the Treatment With Multiple-unit Implant-supported Fixed Dental Prostheses), which is not on this map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04029025 nacompletednot on this map

Complete Digital Workflows for the Treatment With Multiple-unit Implant-supported Fixed Dental Prostheses (iFDP): A Double-blinded Double-randomized Controlled Trial (RCT)

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity Hospital, Basel, SwitzerlandRan2019 to 2023Enrolled20ConditionsPartial-edentulism, Implant-supported Fixed Dental Prostheses (iFDP)ArmsWorkflow A, Workflow B, Workflow C
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Patient-reported outcome measures compared to professional dental assessments of monolithic ZrOJournal of prosthodontics : official journal of the American College of Prosthodontists · 2023
    Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Aiste GintauteDepartment of Reconstructive Dentistry, University Center for Dental Medicine Basel, University of Basel, 4058 Basel, Switzerland.
Karin WeberPrivate Dental Office, 4314 Zeiningen, Switzerland.
Nicola U ZitzmannDepartment of Reconstructive Dentistry, University Center for Dental Medicine Basel, University of Basel, 4058 Basel, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-8228-6545
Urs BräggerDepartment of Reconstructive Dentistry and Gerodontology, School of Dental Medicine, University of Bern, 3010 Bern, Switzerland.
Marco FerrariDepartment of Prosthodontics and Dental Materials, University of Siena, 53100 Siena, Italy.
Tim JodaDepartment of Reconstructive Dentistry, University Center for Dental Medicine Basel, University of Basel, 4058 Basel, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-1338-5419

Funding

International Team for Implantology ITI 1214_2017
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This double-blind randomized controlled trial with a crossover design analyzed the technical and clinical performance of three-unit monolithic ZrO

Indexed as

accuracyclinical trialdental implantdigital workflowfixed dental prosthesis (FDP)monolithicprecisionzirconiazirconium-dioxide (ZrO2)

Identifiers

PMID34208773
PMCPMC8235369

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.