Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34208675›Full record

ArticleNutrients2021

Identifying Low Value Malnutrition Care Activities for De-Implementation and Systematised, Interdisciplinary Alternatives-A Multi-Site, Nominal Group Technique Approach.

Alita Rushton, Kai Elmas, Judith Bauer, Jack J Bell

Open access · goldAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Nutrients, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 31% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Harnessing delegation and technology to identify and manage malnutrition in a digital hospital: An implementation study.Nutrition & dietetics : the journal of the Dietitians Association of Australia · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Alita RushtonDepartment of Nutrition & Dietetics, The Prince Charles Hospital, Chermside, QLD 4032, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-4133-0754
Kai ElmasDepartment of Nutrition & Dietetics, The Prince Charles Hospital, Chermside, QLD 4032, Australia.
Judith BauerSchool of Human Movement & Nutrition Sciences, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, QLD 4067, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-3830-5147
Jack J BellDepartment of Nutrition & Dietetics, The Prince Charles Hospital, Chermside, QLD 4032, Australia.
Prince Charles Hospital · AUThe University of Queensland · AU

Funding

2018 MRFF Next Generation Clinical Researchers Program APP1168080Allied Health Professions Office of Queensland Allied Health Expanded Scope (Implementation Project)
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Malnutrition risk is identified in over one-third of inpatients; reliance on dietetics-delivered nutrition care for all "at-risk" patients is unsustainable, inefficient, and ineffective. This study aimed to identify and prioritise low-value malnutrition care activities for de-implementation and articulate systematised interdisciplinary opportunities. Nine workshops, at eight purposively sampled hospitals, were undertaken using the nominal group technique. Participants were asked "What highly individualised malnutrition care activities do you think we could replace with systematised, interdisciplinary malnutrition care?" and "What systematised, interdisciplinary opportunities do you think we should do to provide more effective and efficient nutrition care in our ward/hospital?" Sixty-three participants were provided five votes per question. The most voted de-implementation activities were low-value nutrition reviews (32); education by dietitian (28); assessments by dietitian for patients with malnutrition screening tool score of two (22); assistants duplicating malnutrition screening (19); and comprehensive, individualised nutrition assessments where unlikely to add value (15). The top voted alternative opportunities were delegated/skill shared interventions (55), delegated/skill shared education (24), abbreviated malnutrition care processes where clinically appropriate (23), delegated/skill shared supportive food/fluids (14), and mealtime assistance (13). Findings highlight opportunities to de-implement perceived low-value malnutrition care activities and replace them with systems and skill shared alternatives across hospital settings.

Indexed as

AdultEducationFemaleHumansInpatientsMaleMalnutritionMiddle AgedNutritionistsNutrition TherapyPatient Care TeamProgram Evaluationassistantsclinical governancede-implementationdelegationdelivery of health careimplementation scienceinterdisciplinarymalnutritionnutritional supportnutrition assessment

Identifiers

PMID34208675
PMCPMC8234755
OpenAlexW3169479442

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.