Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34208598›Full record

ReviewCancers2021

Cancer Epigenetic Biomarkers in Liquid Biopsy for High Incidence Malignancies.

Cora Palanca-Ballester, Aitor Rodriguez-Casanova, Susana Torres, Silvia Calabuig-Fariñas, Francisco Exposito, Diego Serrano, Esther Redin, Karmele Valencia, Eloisa Jantus-Lewintre, Angel Diaz-Lagares and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cancers, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 49 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
49citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.6field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

49 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 76 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Cora Palanca-BallesterBiomarkers and Precision Medicine (UBMP) and Epigenomics Unit, IIS, La Fe, 46026 Valencia, Spain.
Aitor Rodriguez-CasanovaCancer Epigenomics, Translational Medical Oncology (Oncomet), Health Research Institute of Santiago (IDIS), University Clinical Hospital of Santiago (CHUS/SERGAS), 15706 Santiago de Compostela, Spain.
Susana TorresCIBERONC, ISCIII, 28029 Madrid, Spain.
Silvia Calabuig-FariñasCIBERONC, ISCIII, 28029 Madrid, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-7749-174X
Francisco ExpositoCIBERONC, ISCIII, 28029 Madrid, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-5406-0768
Diego SerranoDISNA and Program in Solid Tumors, Center for Applied Medical Research (CIMA), 31008 Pamplona, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-3729-9195
Esther RedinCIBERONC, ISCIII, 28029 Madrid, Spain.
Karmele ValenciaCIBERONC, ISCIII, 28029 Madrid, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-2882-7427
Eloisa Jantus-LewintreCIBERONC, ISCIII, 28029 Madrid, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-7395-4380
Angel Diaz-LagaresCancer Epigenomics, Translational Medical Oncology (Oncomet), Health Research Institute of Santiago (IDIS), University Clinical Hospital of Santiago (CHUS/SERGAS), 15706 Santiago de Compostela, Spain.
Luis MontuengaCIBERONC, ISCIII, 28029 Madrid, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-8739-1387
Juan SandovalBiomarkers and Precision Medicine (UBMP) and Epigenomics Unit, IIS, La Fe, 46026 Valencia, Spain.
Alfonso CalvoCIBERONC, ISCIII, 28029 Madrid, Spain.
Instituto de Salud Carlos III · ESInstituto de Investigación Sanitaria La Fe · ESInstituto de Investigación Sanitaria de Santiago · ESUniversidad de Navarra · ESUniversitat de València · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Early alterations in cancer include the deregulation of epigenetic events such as changes in DNA methylation and abnormal levels of non-coding (nc)RNAs. Although these changes can be identified in tumors, alternative sources of samples may offer advantages over tissue biopsies. Because tumors shed DNA, RNA, and proteins, biological fluids containing these molecules can accurately reflect alterations found in cancer cells, not only coming from the primary tumor, but also from metastasis and from the tumor microenvironment (TME). Depending on the type of cancer, biological fluids encompass blood, urine, cerebrospinal fluid, and saliva, among others. Such samples are named with the general term "liquid biopsy" (LB). With the advent of ultrasensitive technologies during the last decade, the identification of actionable genetic alterations (i.e., mutations) in LB is a common practice to decide whether or not targeted therapy should be applied. Likewise, the analysis of global or specific epigenetic alterations may also be important as biomarkers for diagnosis, prognosis, and even for cancer drug response. Several commercial kits that assess the DNA promoter methylation of single genes or gene sets are available, with some of them being tested as biomarkers for diagnosis in clinical trials. From the tumors with highest incidence, we can stress the relevance of DNA methylation changes in the following genes found in LB:

Indexed as

cancerDNA methylationepigenetic biomarkersmicro-RNAs

Identifiers

PMID34208598
PMCPMC8233712
OpenAlexW3169699960

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.