Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34208548›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2021

Deep Neural Architectures for Contrast Enhanced Ultrasound (CEUS) Focal Liver Lesions Automated Diagnosis.

Cătălin Daniel Căleanu, Cristina Laura Sîrbu, Georgiana Simion

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.9field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 58 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Research on ultrasound-based radiomics: a bibliometric analysis.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2024
    Article
  8. Ultrasonography of Hepatocellular Carcinoma: From Diagnosis to Prognosis.Journal of clinical and translational hepatology · 2024
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Artificial intelligence in liver ultrasound.World journal of gastroenterology · 2022
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Cătălin Daniel CăleanuApplied Electronics Department, Faculty of Electronics, Telecommunications and Information Technologies, Politehnica University Timișoara, 300223 Timișoara, Romania.ORCID 0000-0002-0252-7047
Cristina Laura SîrbuApplied Electronics Department, Faculty of Electronics, Telecommunications and Information Technologies, Politehnica University Timișoara, 300223 Timișoara, Romania.
Georgiana SimionApplied Electronics Department, Faculty of Electronics, Telecommunications and Information Technologies, Politehnica University Timișoara, 300223 Timișoara, Romania.
Polytechnic University of Timişoara · RO

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Computer vision, biomedical image processing and deep learning are related fields with a tremendous impact on the interpretation of medical images today. Among biomedical image sensing modalities, ultrasound (US) is one of the most widely used in practice, since it is noninvasive, accessible, and cheap. Its main drawback, compared to other imaging modalities, like computed tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), consists of the increased dependence on the human operator. One important step toward reducing this dependence is the implementation of a computer-aided diagnosis (CAD) system for US imaging. The aim of the paper is to examine the application of contrast enhanced ultrasound imaging (CEUS) to the problem of automated focal liver lesion (FLL) diagnosis using deep neural networks (DNN). Custom DNN designs are compared with state-of-the-art architectures, either pre-trained or trained from scratch. Our work improves on and broadens previous work in the field in several aspects, e.g., a novel leave-one-patient-out evaluation procedure, which further enabled us to formulate a hard-voting classification scheme. We show the effectiveness of our models, i.e., 88% accuracy reported against a higher number of liver lesion types: hepatocellular carcinomas (HCC), hypervascular metastases (HYPERM), hypovascular metastases (HYPOM), hemangiomas (HEM), and focal nodular hyperplasia (FNH).

Indexed as

Carcinoma, HepatocellularFocal Nodular HyperplasiaLiver NeoplasmsContrast MediaHumansLiverMagnetic Resonance ImagingUltrasonographyContrast MediaCEUScontrast enhanced ultrasound imagingdeep learningdeep neural networksFLLfocal liver lesions

Identifiers

PMID34208548
PMCPMC8235629
OpenAlexW3172157563

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.