Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34208519›Full record

ArticleMicromachines2021

Spark Analysis Based on the CNN-GRU Model for WEDM Process.

Changhong Liu, Xingxin Yang, Shaohu Peng, Yongjun Zhang, Lingxi Peng, Ray Y Zhong

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Micromachines, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Changhong LiuSchool of Electromechanical Engineering, Guangdong University of Technology, Guangzhou 510006, China.
Xingxin YangSchool of Electronics and Communication Engineering, Guangzhou University, Guangzhou 510006, China.
Shaohu PengSchool of Electronics and Communication Engineering, Guangzhou University, Guangzhou 510006, China.
Yongjun ZhangSchool of Electromechanical Engineering, Guangdong University of Technology, Guangzhou 510006, China.
Lingxi PengSchool of Mechanical and Electrical Engineering, Guangzhou University, Guangzhou 510006, China.ORCID 0000-0002-7376-2925
Ray Y ZhongDepartment of Industrial and Manufacturing Systems Engineering, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong 999077, China.

Funding

the Education and Teaching Reform Project for Local Universities of Guangzhou 2019JG223the National Natural Science Foundation of China U1601204the postgraduate education innovation program in Guangdong Province 2019JGXM79the Research Funds for Local Universities of Guangzhou 1201620451the Science and Technology Planning Project of Guangdong Province 2020A1414050067the Science and Technology Planning Project of Guangzhou 202102010392
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Wire electrical discharge machining (WEDM), widely used to fabricate micro and precision parts in manufacturing industry, is a nontraditional machining method using discharge energy which is transformed into thermal energy to efficiently remove materials. A great amount of research has been conducted based on pulse characteristics. However, the spark image-based approach has little research reported. This paper proposes a discharge spark image-based approach. A model is introduced to predict the discharge status using spark image features through a synchronous high-speed image and waveform acquisition system. First, the relationship between the spark image features (e.g., area, energy, energy density, distribution, etc.) and discharge status is explored by a set of experiments). Traditional methods have claimed that pulse waveform of "short" status is related to the status of non-machining while through our research, it is concluded that this is not always true by conducting experiments based on the spark images. Second, a deep learning model based on Convolution neural network (CNN) and Gated recurrent unit (GRU) is proposed to predict the discharge status. A time series of spark image features extracted by CNN form a 3D feature space is used to predict the discharge status through GRU. Moreover, a quantitative labeling method of machining state is proposed to improve the stability of the model. Due the effective features and the quantitative labeling method, the proposed approach achieves better predict result comparing with the single GRU model.

Indexed as

convolution neural network (CNN)deep learninggated recurrent unit (GRU)spark analysiswire electrical discharge machining (WEDM)

Identifiers

PMID34208519
PMCPMC8235280

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.