Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34208338›Full record

ReviewMicromachines2021

Transendothelial Electrical Resistance Measurement across the Blood-Brain Barrier: A Critical Review of Methods.

Judit P Vigh, András Kincses, Burak Ozgür, Fruzsina R Walter, Ana Raquel Santa-Maria, Sándor Valkai, Mónika Vastag, Winfried Neuhaus, Birger Brodin, András Dér and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Micromachines, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 66 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
66citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
9.8field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

66 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 124 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Impact of Tick-BorneInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Article

6 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Judit P VighInstitute of Biophysics, Biological Research Centre, 6726 Szeged, Hungary.
András KincsesInstitute of Biophysics, Biological Research Centre, 6726 Szeged, Hungary.
Burak OzgürDepartment of Pharmacy, University of Copenhagen, 2100 Copenhagen, Denmark.
Fruzsina R WalterInstitute of Biophysics, Biological Research Centre, 6726 Szeged, Hungary.ORCID 0000-0001-8145-2823
Ana Raquel Santa-MariaInstitute of Biophysics, Biological Research Centre, 6726 Szeged, Hungary.
Sándor ValkaiInstitute of Biophysics, Biological Research Centre, 6726 Szeged, Hungary.ORCID 0000-0001-8479-8141
Mónika VastagIn Vitro Metabolism Research, Division of Pharmacology and Drug Safety, Gedeon Richter Plc., 1103 Budapest, Hungary.
Winfried NeuhausCenter for Health and Bioresources, Competence Unit Molecular Diagnostics, AIT-Austrian Institute of Technology GmbH, 1210 Vienna, Austria.ORCID 0000-0002-6552-7183
Birger BrodinDepartment of Pharmacy, University of Copenhagen, 2100 Copenhagen, Denmark.
András DérInstitute of Biophysics, Biological Research Centre, 6726 Szeged, Hungary.ORCID 0000-0001-6112-884X
Mária A DeliInstitute of Biophysics, Biological Research Centre, 6726 Szeged, Hungary.ORCID 0000-0001-6084-6524
HUN-REN Szegedi Biológiai Kutatóközpont · HUUniversity of Copenhagen · DKAustrian Institute of Technology · ATGedeon Richter (Hungary) · HUUniversity of Szeged · HU

Funding

Innovative Medicines Initiative No 807015 (EU H2020 & INI)Lundbeckfonden Research Initiative on Brain Barriers and Drug Delivery. R155-2013-14113Magyar Tudományos Akadémia János Bolyai Research Fellowship BO/00174/18Ministry for Innovation and Technology New National Excellence Program, Bolyai+ fellowship, UNKP-20-5-SZTE-672Nemzeti Kutatási Fejlesztési és Innovációs Hivatal OTKA NNE 129617Nemzeti Kutatási Fejlesztési és Innovációs Hivatal OTKA PD-128480
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The blood-brain barrier (BBB) represents the tightest endothelial barrier within the cardiovascular system characterized by very low ionic permeability. Our aim was to describe the setups, electrodes, and instruments to measure electrical resistance across brain microvessels and culture models of the BBB, as well as critically assess the influence of often neglected physical and technical parameters such as temperature, viscosity, current density generated by different electrode types, surface size, circumference, and porosity of the culture insert membrane. We demonstrate that these physical and technical parameters greatly influence the measurement of transendothelial electrical resistance/resistivity (TEER) across BBB culture models resulting in severalfold differences in TEER values of the same biological model, especially in the low-TEER range. We show that elevated culture medium viscosity significantly increases, while higher membrane porosity decreases TEER values. TEER data measured by chopstick electrodes can be threefold higher than values measured by chamber electrodes due to different electrode size and geometry, resulting in current distribution inhomogeneity. An additional shunt resistance at the circumference of culture inserts results in lower TEER values. A detailed description of setups and technical parameters is crucial for the correct interpretation and comparison of TEER values of BBB models.

Indexed as

blood–brain barriercell culture insertelectrodesendothelial cellepithelial cellimpedancelab-on-a-chiptransendothelial electrical resistanceviscosity

Identifiers

PMID34208338
PMCPMC8231150
OpenAlexW3168667198

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.