ArticleViruses2021
Quality Assessment and Validation of High-Throughput Sequencing for Grapevine Virus Diagnostics.
Article in Viruses, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed, 39 citations in OpenAlex.
- CRISPR-Cas13-based amplification-free detection of three quarantine-significant sugarcane viruses.Plant cell reports · 2026Article
- A Validation Study of a High-Throughput Sequencing Workflow for the Detection of Grapevine Viruses and Viroids.Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Article
- Validation of an In-House High-Throughput Total RNA Sequencing Test for the Detection of Plant Viruses and Viroids.Viruses · 2026Article
- Managing Plant Viruses in Tissue-Cultured Apple and Grapevine: Strategies for Detection and Eradication.The plant pathology journal · 2025Review
- Viroscope™: a universal solution for plant virus and viroid diagnostics using HTS and cloud-based analysis.Frontiers in microbiology · 2025Article
- High-Throughput Sequencing for the Detection of Viruses in Grapevine: Performance Analysis and Best Practices.Viruses · 2024Article
- High-Throughput Sequencing Methods for the Detection of Two Strawberry Viruses in Post-Entry Quarantine.Viruses · 2024Article
- Simulated High Throughput Sequencing Datasets: A Crucial Tool for Validating Bioinformatic Pathogen Detection Pipelines.Biology · 2024Article
- Validation of High-Throughput Sequencing (HTS) for Routine Detection of Citrus Viruses and Viroids.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2024Article
- Article
- Reproducibility and Sensitivity of High-Throughput Sequencing (HTS)-Based Detection of Citrus Tristeza Virus and Three Citrus Viroids.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Grapevine virome and production of healthy plants by somatic embryogenesis.Microbial biotechnology · 2022Article
- Detection of Banana Mild Mosaic Virus inPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Viroscope: Plant viral diagnosis from high-throughput sequencing data using biologically-informed genome assembly coverage.Frontiers in microbiology · 2022Article
- High-throughput sequencing application in the detection and discovery of viruses associated with the regulated citrus leprosis disease complex.Frontiers in plant science · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Development of High-Throughput Sequencing (HTS), also known as next generation sequencing, revolutionized diagnostic research of plant viruses. HTS outperforms bioassays and molecular diagnostic assays that are used to screen domestic and quarantine grapevine materials in data throughput, cost, scalability, and detection of novel and highly variant virus species. However, before HTS-based assays can be routinely used for plant virus diagnostics, performance specifications need to be developed and assessed. In this study, we selected 18 virus-infected grapevines as a test panel for measuring performance characteristics of an HTS-based diagnostic assay. Total nucleic acid (TNA) was extracted from petioles and dormant canes of individual samples and constructed libraries were run on Illumina NextSeq 500 instrument using a 75-bp single-end read platform. Sensitivity was 98% measured over 264 distinct virus and viroid infections with a false discovery rate (FDR) of approximately 1 in 5 positives. The results also showed that combining a spring petiole test with a fall cane test increased sensitivity to 100% for this TNA HTS assay. To evaluate extraction methodology, these results were compared to parallel dsRNA extractions. In addition, in a more detailed dilution study, the TNA HTS assay described here consistently performed well down to a dilution of 5%. In that range, sensitivity was 98% with a corresponding FDR of approximately 1 in 5. Repeatability and reproducibility were assessed at 99% and 93%, respectively. The protocol, criteria, and performance levels described here may help to standardize HTS for quality assurance and accreditation purposes in plant quarantine or certification programs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.