Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34208336›Full record

ArticleViruses2021

Quality Assessment and Validation of High-Throughput Sequencing for Grapevine Virus Diagnostics.

Nourolah Soltani, Kristian A Stevens, Vicki Klaassen, Min-Sook Hwang, Deborah A Golino, Maher Al Rwahnih

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Viruses, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
6.6field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 39 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Detection of Banana Mild Mosaic Virus inPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Nourolah SoltaniDepartment of Plant Pathology, University of California-Davis, Davis, CA 95616, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8071-2803
Kristian A StevensFoundation Plant Services, University of California-Davis, Davis, CA 95616, USA.
Vicki KlaassenFoundation Plant Services, University of California-Davis, Davis, CA 95616, USA.
Min-Sook HwangFoundation Plant Services, University of California-Davis, Davis, CA 95616, USA.
Deborah A GolinoDepartment of Plant Pathology, University of California-Davis, Davis, CA 95616, USA.
Maher Al RwahnihDepartment of Plant Pathology, University of California-Davis, Davis, CA 95616, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1589-9234
University of California, Davis · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Development of High-Throughput Sequencing (HTS), also known as next generation sequencing, revolutionized diagnostic research of plant viruses. HTS outperforms bioassays and molecular diagnostic assays that are used to screen domestic and quarantine grapevine materials in data throughput, cost, scalability, and detection of novel and highly variant virus species. However, before HTS-based assays can be routinely used for plant virus diagnostics, performance specifications need to be developed and assessed. In this study, we selected 18 virus-infected grapevines as a test panel for measuring performance characteristics of an HTS-based diagnostic assay. Total nucleic acid (TNA) was extracted from petioles and dormant canes of individual samples and constructed libraries were run on Illumina NextSeq 500 instrument using a 75-bp single-end read platform. Sensitivity was 98% measured over 264 distinct virus and viroid infections with a false discovery rate (FDR) of approximately 1 in 5 positives. The results also showed that combining a spring petiole test with a fall cane test increased sensitivity to 100% for this TNA HTS assay. To evaluate extraction methodology, these results were compared to parallel dsRNA extractions. In addition, in a more detailed dilution study, the TNA HTS assay described here consistently performed well down to a dilution of 5%. In that range, sensitivity was 98% with a corresponding FDR of approximately 1 in 5. Repeatability and reproducibility were assessed at 99% and 93%, respectively. The protocol, criteria, and performance levels described here may help to standardize HTS for quality assurance and accreditation purposes in plant quarantine or certification programs.

Indexed as

High-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingMolecular Diagnostic TechniquesPlant DiseasesPlant VirusesReproducibility of ResultsRNA, ViralSensitivity and SpecificityVitisRNA, Viralgrapevine virushigh-throughput sequencingperformance assessmentrepeatabilityreproducibilitysensitivityspecificityvalidation

Identifiers

PMID34208336
PMCPMC8231206
OpenAlexW3170780633

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.