Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34208253›Full record

ArticleCancers2021

Early Progression in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) with High PD-L1 Treated with Pembrolizumab in First-Line Setting: A Prognostic Scoring System Based on Clinical Features.

Antonio Passaro, Silvia Novello, Diana Giannarelli, Emilio Bria, Domenico Galetta, Alain Gelibter, Maria Lucia Reale, Simona Carnio, Emanuele Vita, Alessio Stefani and 4 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancers, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Early Detriment Analysis of First-Line Nivolumab plus Ipilimumab-Based Therapy in Patients with Metastatic Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2026
    Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Antonio PassaroDivision of Thoracic Oncology, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, 20141 Milano, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-7575-3870
Silvia NovelloDepartment of Oncology, Università Degli Studi Di Torino-AOU San Luigi Gonzaga, 10043 Orbassano, Italy.
Diana GiannarelliIstituto Nazionale Tumori Regina Elena, IRCCS, 00144 Roma, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-6085-1195
Emilio BriaComprehensive Cancer Center, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, 00168 Roma, Italy.
Domenico GalettaMedical Thoracic Unit, IRCCS Oncologico Giovanni Paolo II, 70124 Bari, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-4878-5906
Alain GelibterMedical Oncology Unit "B", Policlinico Umberto I, Sapienza University, 00161 Roma, Italy.
Maria Lucia RealeDepartment of Oncology, Università Degli Studi Di Torino-AOU San Luigi Gonzaga, 10043 Orbassano, Italy.
Simona CarnioDepartment of Oncology, Università Degli Studi Di Torino-AOU San Luigi Gonzaga, 10043 Orbassano, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-4338-1961
Emanuele VitaComprehensive Cancer Center, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, 00168 Roma, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-4546-547X
Alessio StefaniComprehensive Cancer Center, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, 00168 Roma, Italy.
Pamela PizzutiloMedical Thoracic Unit, IRCCS Oncologico Giovanni Paolo II, 70124 Bari, Italy.
Valeria StatiDivision of Thoracic Oncology, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, 20141 Milano, Italy.
Ilaria AttiliDivision of Thoracic Oncology, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, 20141 Milano, Italy.
Filippo de MarinisDivision of Thoracic Oncology, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, 20141 Milano, Italy.
European Institute of Oncology · ITOspedale San Luigi Gonzaga · ITUniversità Cattolica del Sacro Cuore · ITIstituto Tumori Bari · ITFondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori · ITPoliclinico Umberto I · IT

Funding

Associazione Italiana per la Ricerca sul Cancro No. IG20583Ministero della Salute 5x1000Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore UCSC-project D1-2019-2020
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPembrolizumab is approved in monotherapy for the first-line (1L) of advanced or metastatic NSCLC patients with high PD-L1 (≥50%). Despite a proportion of patients achieve long-term survival, about one-third of patients experience detrimental survival outcomes, including early death, hyperprogression, and fast progression. The impact of clinical factors on early progression (EP) development has not been widely explored.

methodsWe designed a retrospective, multicenter study involving five Italian centers, in patients with metastatic NSCLC with PD-L1 ≥ 50%, treated with Pembrolizumab in a 1L setting. EP was defined as a progressive disease within three months from pembrolizumab initiation. Baseline clinical factors of patients with and without EP were collected and analyzed. Logistic regression was performed to identify clinical factors associated with EP and an EP prognostic score was developed based on the logistic model.

resultsOverall, 321 out of 336 NSCLC patients treated with 1L pembrolizumab provided all the data for the analysis. EP occurred in 137 (42.7%) patients; the median PFS was 3.8 months (95% CI: 2.9-4.7), and median OS was not reached in the entire study population. Sex, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status (PS), steroids, metastatic sites ≥2, and the presence of liver/pleural metastasis were confirmed as independent factors for EP by multivariate analysis. By combining these factors, we developed an EP prognostic score ranging from 0-13, with three-risk group stratification: 0-2 (good prognosis), 3-6 (intermediate prognosis), and 7-13 (poor prognosis). The area under the curve (AUC) of the model was 0.76 (95% CI: 0.70-0.81).

conclusionsWe identified six clinical factors independently associated with EP. We developed a prognostic score model for EP-risk to potentially improve clinical practice and patient selection for 1L pembrolizumab in NSCLC with high PD-L1, in the real-world clinical setting.

Indexed as

corticosteroiddetrimental effectimmunotherapyNSCLCpleural metastasisprognosis

Identifiers

PMID34208253
PMCPMC8230881
OpenAlexW3171168408

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.