Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34208009›Full record

ArticleLife (Basel, Switzerland)2021

The Effectiveness of Robot- vs. Virtual Reality-Based Gait Rehabilitation: A Propensity Score Matched Cohort.

Emilia Biffi, Elena Beretta, Fabio Alexander Storm, Claudio Corbetta, Sandra Strazzer, Alessandra Pedrocchi, Emilia Ambrosini

2 registry-linked trialsOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Life (Basel, Switzerland), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05670522 nacompletednot on this map

Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Versus Virtual Reality on Gait in Children With Spastic Diplegia

TypeinterventionalSponsorBeni-Suef UniversityRan2020 to 2021Enrolled40ConditionsCerebral PalsyArmsTranscranial direct current stimulation, Virtual reality
NCT06884956 enrolling by invitationnot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

Assessment of High-tech Rehabilitation Impact on Muscular Tissue Using MRI Derived Biomarkers

TypeobservationalSponsorIRCCS Eugenio MedeaRan2023 to 2025Enrolled30ConditionsMovement Disorders, Treatment
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Emilia BiffiScientific Institute, IRCCS "Eugenio Medea", Bosisio Parini, 23842 Lecco, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-2568-9735
Elena BerettaScientific Institute, IRCCS "Eugenio Medea", Bosisio Parini, 23842 Lecco, Italy.
Fabio Alexander StormScientific Institute, IRCCS "Eugenio Medea", Bosisio Parini, 23842 Lecco, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-5977-8090
Claudio CorbettaScientific Institute, IRCCS "Eugenio Medea", Bosisio Parini, 23842 Lecco, Italy.
Sandra StrazzerScientific Institute, IRCCS "Eugenio Medea", Bosisio Parini, 23842 Lecco, Italy.
Alessandra PedrocchiNEARLab, Department of Electronics, Information and Bioengineering, Politecnico di Milano, 20133 Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-9957-2786
Emilia AmbrosiniNEARLab, Department of Electronics, Information and Bioengineering, Politecnico di Milano, 20133 Milan, Italy.
IRCCS Eugenio Medea · ITPolitecnico di Milano · IT

Funding

Fondazione Cariplo EMPATIA@LeccoMinistero della Salute RC 2020/2021 to E. BiffiRegione Lombardia EMPATIA@Lecco
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Robot assisted gait training (RAGT) and virtual reality plus treadmill training (VRTT) are two technologies that can support locomotion rehabilitation in children and adolescents affected by acquired brain injury (ABI). The literature provides evidence of their effectiveness in this population. However, a comparison between these methods is not available. This study aims at comparing the effectiveness of RAGT and VRTT for the gait rehabilitation of children and adolescents suffering from ABI. This is a prospective cohort study with propensity score matching. Between October 2016 and September 2018, all patients undergoing an intensive gait rehabilitation treatment based on RAGT or VRTT were prospectively observed. To minimize selection bias associated with the study design, patients who underwent RAGT or VRTT were retrospectively matched for age, gender, time elapsed from injury, level of impairment, and motor impairment using propensity score in a matching ratio of 1:1. Outcome measures were Gross Motor Function Mesure-88 (GMFM-88), six-min walking test (6MWT), Gillette Functional Assessment Questionnaire (FAQ), and three-dimensional gait analysis (GA). The FAQ and the GMFM-88 had a statistically significant increase in both groups while the 6MWT improved in the RAGT group only. GA highlighted changes at the proximal level in the RAGT group, and at the distal district in the VRTT group. Although preliminary, this work suggests that RAGT and VRTT protocols foster different motor improvements, thus recommending to couple the two therapies in the paediatric population with ABI.

Indexed as

acquired brain injurychildrencohort studypropensity score matchingrobot-assisted gait trainingvirtual reality plus treadmill training

Identifiers

PMID34208009
PMCPMC8230650
OpenAlexW3172473783

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.