Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34207837›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2021

The Effect of an Alternative Definition of "Percent Highly Annoyed" on the Exposure-Response Relationship: Comparison of Noise Annoyance Responses Measured by ICBEN 5-Point Verbal and 11-Point Numerical Scales.

Makoto Morinaga, Thu Lan Nguyen, Shigenori Yokoshima, Koji Shimoyama, Takashi Morihara, Takashi Yano

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Association between Noise Annoyance and Mental Health Outcomes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Pooled it
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Makoto MorinagaDepartment of Architecture, Faculty of Engineering, Kanagawa University, Kanagawa 221-8686, Japan.
Thu Lan NguyenDepartment of Architectural Design, Interdisciplinary Faculty of Science and Engineering, Shimane University, Shimane 690-8504, Japan.ORCID 0000-0003-2816-1968
Shigenori YokoshimaKanagawa Environmental Research Center, Kanagawa 254-0014, Japan.
Koji ShimoyamaAviation Environment Research Center, Organization of Airport Facilitation, Tokyo 105-0011, Japan.
Takashi MoriharaDepartment of Architecture, National Institute of Technology, Ishikawa College, Ishikawa 929-0392, Japan.
Takashi YanoKumamoto University, Kumamoto 860-8555, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Since the development of the 5-point verbal and 11-point numerical scales for measuring noise annoyance by the ICBEN Team 6, these scales have been widely used in socio-acoustic surveys worldwide, and annoyance responses have been easily compared internationally. However, both the top two categories of the 5-point verbal scale and the top three ones of the 11-point numerical scale are correspond to high annoyance, so it is difficult to precisely compare annoyance responses. Therefore, we calculated differences in day-evening-night-weighted sound pressure levels (

Indexed as

Noise, TransportationEnvironmental ExposureJapanSurveys and QuestionnairesSwitzerlandVietnamexposure–response relationshiphighly annoyedICBEN scalessocial survey

Identifiers

PMID34207837
PMCPMC8296053

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.