ArticleMaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2021
The Influence of Background Ultrasonic Field on the Strength of Adhesive Zones under Dynamic Impact Loads.
Article in Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The influence of background ultrasonic field on the ultimate dynamic strength of adhesive joints is studied using fracture mechanics analysis. Winkler foundation-type models are applied to describe the cohesion zone, and the incubation time fracture criterion is used. The challenging task is to study whether relatively weak ultrasound is able to decrease the threshold values of the external impact load depending on a joint model, such as an "elastic membrane" or "beam" approximation, and various boundary conditions at the ends. The specific task was to investigate the case of short pulse loading through application of time-dependent fracture criterion instead of the conventional principle of critical stress. Three different load cases, namely, step constant force, dynamic pulse, and their combination with ultrasonic vibrations, were also studied. The analytical solution to the problem demonstrates that background vibrations at certain frequencies can significantly decrease threshold values of fracture impact load. Specific calculations indicate that even a weak background sonic field is enough to cause a significant reduction in the threshold amplitude of a dynamic short pulse load. Additionally, non-monotonic dependency of threshold amplitude on pulse duration for weak background field was observed, which demonstrates the existence of optimal regimes of impact energy input. Moreover, this phenomenon does not depend on the way in which the beam edges mount, whether they are clamped or hinged, and it could be applied for micro-electro-mechanical switch design processes as an additional tool to control operational regimes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.