ArticleDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2021
Prognostic Value of Combing Primary Tumor and Nodal Glycolytic-Volumetric Parameters of
Article in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- The prognostic value ofAnnals of nuclear medicine · 2026Article
- The Emerging Roles of Metabolic Reprogramming in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Progression.Frontiers in bioscience (Landmark edition) · 2025Review
- Prognostic value of combining clinical factors,Annals of nuclear medicine · 2024Article
- Editorial on Special Issue "Quantitative PET and SPECT".Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- The value ofTzu chi medical journalReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
We investigated whether the combination of primary tumor and nodal
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.