Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34207695›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2021

Ocean-Bottom Seismographs Based on Broadband MET Sensors: Architecture and Deployment Case Study in the Arctic.

Artem A Krylov, Ivan V Egorov, Sergey A Kovachev, Dmitry A Ilinskiy, Oleg Yu Ganzha, Georgy K Timashkevich, Konstantin A Roginskiy, Mikhail E Kulikov, Mikhail A Novikov, Vladimir N Ivanov and 7 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Artem A KrylovShirshov Institute of Oceanology, Russian Academy of Sciences, 36, Nakhimovskiy Prospekt, 117997 Moscow, Russia.
Ivan V EgorovMoscow Institute of Physics and Technology, 9, Institutsky lane, 141700 Dolgoprudny, Russia.
Sergey A KovachevShirshov Institute of Oceanology, Russian Academy of Sciences, 36, Nakhimovskiy Prospekt, 117997 Moscow, Russia.
Dmitry A IlinskiyShirshov Institute of Oceanology, Russian Academy of Sciences, 36, Nakhimovskiy Prospekt, 117997 Moscow, Russia.
Oleg Yu GanzhaShirshov Institute of Oceanology, Russian Academy of Sciences, 36, Nakhimovskiy Prospekt, 117997 Moscow, Russia.
Georgy K TimashkevichShirshov Institute of Oceanology, Russian Academy of Sciences, 36, Nakhimovskiy Prospekt, 117997 Moscow, Russia.
Konstantin A RoginskiyShirshov Institute of Oceanology, Russian Academy of Sciences, 36, Nakhimovskiy Prospekt, 117997 Moscow, Russia.
Mikhail E KulikovShirshov Institute of Oceanology, Russian Academy of Sciences, 36, Nakhimovskiy Prospekt, 117997 Moscow, Russia.
Mikhail A NovikovShirshov Institute of Oceanology, Russian Academy of Sciences, 36, Nakhimovskiy Prospekt, 117997 Moscow, Russia.ORCID 0000-0002-6366-5232
Vladimir N IvanovShirshov Institute of Oceanology, Russian Academy of Sciences, 36, Nakhimovskiy Prospekt, 117997 Moscow, Russia.
Elena A RadiukShirshov Institute of Oceanology, Russian Academy of Sciences, 36, Nakhimovskiy Prospekt, 117997 Moscow, Russia.
Daria D RukavishnikovaShirshov Institute of Oceanology, Russian Academy of Sciences, 36, Nakhimovskiy Prospekt, 117997 Moscow, Russia.
Alexander V NeeshpapaMoscow Institute of Physics and Technology, 9, Institutsky lane, 141700 Dolgoprudny, Russia.
Grigory O VelichkoKuban State University (KubSU), 149, Stavropolskaya St., 350040 Krasnodar, Russia.
Leopold I LobkovskyShirshov Institute of Oceanology, Russian Academy of Sciences, 36, Nakhimovskiy Prospekt, 117997 Moscow, Russia.
Igor P MedvedevShirshov Institute of Oceanology, Russian Academy of Sciences, 36, Nakhimovskiy Prospekt, 117997 Moscow, Russia.
Igor P SemiletovV.I. Il'ichev Pacific Oceanological Institute, Far Eastern Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 43, Baltijskaya St., 690041 Vladivostok, Russia.
Institute of Oceanology. PP Shirshov Russian Academy of Sciences · RUMoscow Institute of Physics and Technology · RUKuban State University · RUNational Research Tomsk State University · RU

Funding

Russian Foundation for Basic Research 19-37-90106Russian Foundation for Basic Research 20-05-00533Russian Foundation for Basic Research 20-35-90096Russian Science Foundation 20-77-00034Russian Science Foundation 21-77-30001Russian State Assignment 0128-2021-0011
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Arctic seas are now of particular interest due to their prospects in terms of hydrocarbon extraction, development of marine transport routes, etc. Thus, various geohazards, including those related to seismicity, require detailed studies, especially by instrumental methods. This paper is devoted to the ocean-bottom seismographs (OBS) based on broadband molecular-electronic transfer (MET) sensors and a deployment case study in the Laptev Sea. The purpose of the study is to introduce the architecture of several modifications of OBS and to demonstrate their applicability in solving different tasks in the framework of seismic hazard assessment for the Arctic seas. To do this, we used the first results of several pilot deployments of the OBS developed by Shirshov Institute of Oceanology of the Russian Academy of Sciences (IO RAS) and IP Ilyinskiy A.D. in the Laptev Sea that took place in 2018-2020. We highlighted various seismological applications of OBS based on broadband MET sensors CME-4311 (60 s) and CME-4111 (120 s), including the analysis of ambient seismic noise, registering the signals of large remote earthquakes and weak local microearthquakes, and the instrumental approach of the site response assessment. The main characteristics of the broadband MET sensors and OBS architectures turned out to be suitable for obtaining high-quality OBS records under the Arctic conditions to solve seismological problems. In addition, the obtained case study results showed the prospects in a broader context, such as the possible influence of the seismotectonic factor on the bottom-up thawing of subsea permafrost and massive methane release, probably from decaying hydrates and deep geological sources. The described OBS will be actively used in further Arctic expeditions.

Indexed as

ambient seismic noiseArctic regionLaptev Sealocal microearthquakemolecular–electronic transfer seismometerocean-bottom seismographseismic hazard assessmentsite response analysisteleseismic signal

Identifiers

PMID34207695
PMCPMC8228194
OpenAlexW3170153028

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.