Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34207594›Full record

ArticleCurrent oncology (Toronto, Ont.)2021

Immunohistochemistry for Prostate Biopsy-Impact on Histological Prostate Cancer Diagnoses and Clinical Decision Making.

Philipp Mandel, Mike Wenzel, Benedikt Hoeh, Maria N Welte, Felix Preisser, Tahir Inam, Clarissa Wittler, Clara Humke, Jens Köllermann, Peter Wild and 7 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Optimizing Expression of a Llama-Based Anti-PSMA Nanobody inAdvanced pharmaceutical bulletin · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors.

Philipp MandelDepartment of Urology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Goethe University Frankfurt, 60590 Frankfurt, Germany.
Mike WenzelDepartment of Urology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Goethe University Frankfurt, 60590 Frankfurt, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-4338-0889
Benedikt HoehDepartment of Urology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Goethe University Frankfurt, 60590 Frankfurt, Germany.
Maria N WelteDepartment of Urology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Goethe University Frankfurt, 60590 Frankfurt, Germany.
Felix PreisserDepartment of Urology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Goethe University Frankfurt, 60590 Frankfurt, Germany.
Tahir InamDepartment of Urology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Goethe University Frankfurt, 60590 Frankfurt, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-4295-9098
Clarissa WittlerDepartment of Urology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Goethe University Frankfurt, 60590 Frankfurt, Germany.
Clara HumkeDepartment of Urology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Goethe University Frankfurt, 60590 Frankfurt, Germany.
Jens KöllermannDr. Senckenberg Institute of Pathology, University Hospital Frankfurt, 60590 Frankfurt, Germany.
Peter WildDr. Senckenberg Institute of Pathology, University Hospital Frankfurt, 60590 Frankfurt, Germany.
Christoph WürnschimmelCancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montreal Health Center, Montreal, QC H2X3A4, Canada.
Derya TilkiMartini-Klinik Prostate Cancer Center, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, 20251 Hamburg, Germany.
Markus GraefenMartini-Klinik Prostate Cancer Center, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, 20251 Hamburg, Germany.
Luis A KluthDepartment of Urology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Goethe University Frankfurt, 60590 Frankfurt, Germany.
Pierre I KarakiewiczCancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montreal Health Center, Montreal, QC H2X3A4, Canada.
Felix K-H ChunDepartment of Urology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Goethe University Frankfurt, 60590 Frankfurt, Germany.
Andreas BeckerDepartment of Urology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Goethe University Frankfurt, 60590 Frankfurt, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTo test the value of immunohistochemistry (IHC) staining in prostate biopsies for changes in biopsy results and its impact on treatment decision-making.

methodsBetween January 2017-June 2020, all patients undergoing prostate biopsies were identified and evaluated regarding additional IHC staining for diagnostic purpose. Final pathologic results after radical prostatectomy (RP) were analyzed regarding the effect of IHC at biopsy.

resultsOf 606 biopsies, 350 (58.7%) received additional IHC staining. Of those, prostate cancer (PCa) was found in 208 patients (59.4%); while in 142 patients (40.6%), PCa could be ruled out through IHC. IHC patients harbored significantly more often Gleason 6 in biopsy (

conclusionsPatients with IHC stains had less suspicious characteristics than patients without IHC. Moreover, in patients with positive IHC and PCa detection, a change in biopsy results was observed in >40%. Patients with changes in biopsy results partly underwent RP, in which 60% harbored significant PCa.

Indexed as

Prostatic NeoplasmsBiopsyClinical Decision-MakingHumansImmunohistochemistryMaleNeoplasm GradingASAPGleason ScoreIHCimmunohistochemistryprostate cancerradical prostatectomy

Identifiers

PMID34207594
PMCPMC8293248

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.