ArticleVaccines2021
Safety of ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 Vaccine: Independent Evidence from Two EU States.
Article in Vaccines, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 46 papers, 8 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
46 citing papers in PubMed, 8 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 68 citations in OpenAlex.
- Headache following vaccination against COVID-19 among healthcare workers with a history of COVID-19 infection: a cross-sectional study in Iran with a meta-analytic review of the literature.Head & face medicine · 2023Pooled it
- Global incidence pattern and factors associated with common cutaneous reactions related to COVID-19 vaccination of 2.55 million participants in real-world settings: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Journal of global health · 2023Pooled it
- Global prevalence and clinical manifestations of cutaneous adverse reactions following COVID-19 vaccination: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology : JEADV · 2022Pooled it
- SARS-CoV-2 vaccine-related cutaneous manifestations: a systematic review.International journal of dermatology · 2022Pooled it
- Cutaneous adverse reactions following COVID-19 vaccinations: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Journal of cosmetic dermatology · 2022Pooled it
- Meaningful use of imaging resources to rule out cerebral venous sinus thrombosis after ChAdOx1 COVID-19 vaccination: Evaluation of the AHA diagnostic algorithm with a clinical cohort and a systematic data review.Journal of clinical neuroscience : official journal of the Neurosurgical Society of Australasia · 2022Pooled it
- A systematic review on mucocutaneous presentations after COVID-19 vaccination and expert recommendations about vaccination of important immune-mediated dermatologic disorders.Dermatologic therapy · 2022Pooled it
- Effectiveness and safety of SARS-CoV-2 vaccine in real-world studies: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Infectious diseases of poverty · 2021Pooled it
- Seasonal influenza vaccine and frequency of adverse events in health workers receiving two doses of AstraZeneca vaccine: a retrospective cohort study.Virus research · 2026Article
- A study on the side effects caused by the Pfizer/BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine: Focus on IgG antibodies and serological biomarkers.Central-European journal of immunology · 2024Article
- Outcomes following COVID-19 vaccination and associated factors among healthcare professionals in Oromia region, Ethiopia.Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics · 2023Article
- Prolonged febrile illness following first dose of ChAdOx1.BMJ case reports · 2023Article
- Sex-disaggregated outcomes of adverse events after COVID-19 vaccination: A Dutch cohort study and review of the literature.Frontiers in immunology · 2023Review
- Vaccine Side Effects in Health Care Workers after Vaccination against SARS-CoV-2: Data from TüSeRe:exact Study.Viruses · 2022Article
- Self-Reported adverse events among Chinese healthcare workers immunized with COVID-19 vaccines composed of inactivated SARS-CoV-2.Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics · 2022Article
- Article
- Article
- COVID-19 Vaccines Adverse Reactions Reported to the Pharmacovigilance Unit of Beira Interior in Portugal.Journal of clinical medicine · 2022Article
- Cutaneous Adverse Reactions to SARS-CoV-2 Vaccines: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Vaccines · 2022Review
- Prevalence of COVID-19 vaccine reactogenicity among Bangladeshi physicians.FASEB bioAdvances · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Recent reports of thrombosis following AstraZeneca COVID-19 vaccine in young females (<55 years-old) led to temporary suspension and urgent investigation by the European Medicines Agency (EMA) that concluded that vaccine benefits still outweigh its side effects (SEs). Therefore, this study aims to provide early independent evidence on the vaccine SEs' prevalence and their potential risk factors; a cross-sectional survey-based study was carried out between February and March 2021 in Germany and Czech Republic among healthcare workers who recently received the AstraZeneca COVID-19 vaccine. The study used a validated self-administered questionnaire composed of twenty-eight multiple-choice items covering demographic variables, medical anamneses, and local, systemic, oral, and skin related SEs of the vaccine. Out of the ninety-two included participants, 77.2% were females and 79.3% were from Germany. Their mean age was 35.37 ± 12.62 (19-64) years-old, 15.2% had chronic illnesses and 22.8% were receiving medical treatments. Overall, 94.6% of the participants reported at least one SE. The most common local SE was injection site pain (72.8%), and the most common systemic SEs were fatigue (73.9%), muscle pain (55.4%), chills (48.9%), feeling unwell (46.7%), nausea (45.7%), and headache (29.3%). The vast majority (91.9%) resolved within 1-3 days, and the below 35 years-old group was the least affected age group. The SEs' frequency was insignificantly higher in females and previously infected participants; the vaccine safety for the elderly was supported by the early findings of this study. Chronic illnesses and medical treatments were not associated with an increased risk of SE incidence and frequency. No blood disorder SEs were reported in our sample. Further independent studies are highly required to evaluate the safety of the AstraZeneca vaccine and to explore whether gender or previous infection could be associated with the vaccine SEs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.