Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34207252›Full record

ReviewCancers2021

Cancer and Pregnancy: A Comprehensive Review.

Roxana Schwab, Katharina Anic, Annette Hasenburg

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cancers, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Cancer diagnosed during pregnancy: a qualitative study of women's psychosocial experiences during treatment and survivorship.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Cancer in pregnancy: treatment effects.Abdominal radiology (New York) · 2023
    Review
  17. Cancer in pregnancy: overview and epidemiology.Abdominal radiology (New York) · 2023
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Roxana SchwabDepartment of Obstetrics and Women's Health, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, 55131 Mainz, Germany.
Katharina AnicDepartment of Obstetrics and Women's Health, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, 55131 Mainz, Germany.
Annette HasenburgDepartment of Obstetrics and Women's Health, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, 55131 Mainz, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-1547-4968

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cancer diagnosis and treatment in pregnant women is a challenging situation. A multidisciplinary network of specialists is required to guide both, the expecting mother and the unborn child through the diagnostic workup and the cytotoxic therapy, by balancing the respective risks and benefits. Tumor entity, stage, biology and gestational week at diagnosis determine the appropriate approach. As premature delivery emerged as one of the main risk factors for adverse long-term outcome of the progeny, it should be avoided, if reasonable from the oncological perspective. This article offers a comprehensive review with respect to the various aspects of cancer in pregnancy.

Indexed as

cancerdiagnostic proceduresfetal outcomepregnancytherapeutic procedures

Identifiers

PMID34207252
PMCPMC8234287

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.