ArticleThe Ulster medical journal1988
Considerations for smoking advice in pregnancy.
Article in The Ulster medical journal, 1988. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cigarette smoking in pregnancy was the single most important preventable factor identified when determinants of birth weight were studied in 375 pregnancies. Current professional intervention was not effective in reducing cigarette consumption in pregnancy in these mothers in Londonderry, of whom only 19 (5%) became ex-smokers. Present health education, which emphasises impaired fetal growth and wellbeing, had its greatest effect amongst primigravid smokers of whom 32% made some reduction in cigarette consumption. Maternal expectation of birth weight differed significantly between non-smokers, light to moderate, and heavy smokers (8.2 lb, 7.9 lb, 7.3 lb respectively). 54% of multiparous smokers expected the birth weight to be similar to the birth weight in previous pregnancies. Of the women who reduced smoking, 57% did so for the baby, 23% because they found the habit less pleasurable during pregnancy and 13% because of professional advice. Maternal expectation of birth weight is one factor which negates the slant of current health education advice in pregnancy. An anti-smoking programme aimed at protecting the fetus from the harmful effects of cigarettes may produce optimal results when targeted at primary school-aged children in whom the smoking habit is less firmly established.
Indexed as
Identifiers
3420720PMC2448473What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.