Evidence map›Paper›PMID 3420720›Full record

ArticleThe Ulster medical journal1988

Considerations for smoking advice in pregnancy.

A E Hill

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Ulster medical journal, 1988. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

A E Hill

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cigarette smoking in pregnancy was the single most important preventable factor identified when determinants of birth weight were studied in 375 pregnancies. Current professional intervention was not effective in reducing cigarette consumption in pregnancy in these mothers in Londonderry, of whom only 19 (5%) became ex-smokers. Present health education, which emphasises impaired fetal growth and wellbeing, had its greatest effect amongst primigravid smokers of whom 32% made some reduction in cigarette consumption. Maternal expectation of birth weight differed significantly between non-smokers, light to moderate, and heavy smokers (8.2 lb, 7.9 lb, 7.3 lb respectively). 54% of multiparous smokers expected the birth weight to be similar to the birth weight in previous pregnancies. Of the women who reduced smoking, 57% did so for the baby, 23% because they found the habit less pleasurable during pregnancy and 13% because of professional advice. Maternal expectation of birth weight is one factor which negates the slant of current health education advice in pregnancy. An anti-smoking programme aimed at protecting the fetus from the harmful effects of cigarettes may produce optimal results when targeted at primary school-aged children in whom the smoking habit is less firmly established.

Indexed as

Pregnancy ComplicationsAdultBirth WeightFemaleHumansInfant, NewbornNorthern IrelandPregnancySmoking

Identifiers

PMID3420720
PMCPMC2448473

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.