Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34207198›Full record

SynthesisSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2021

Wearable Technology to Detect Motor Fluctuations in Parkinson's Disease Patients: Current State and Challenges.

Mercedes Barrachina-Fernández, Ana María Maitín, Carmen Sánchez-Ávila, Juan Pablo Romero

Registry-linked trialAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05221697 (Effect of an Electronic Alert Management System Using Caregivers' Observations and Machine Learning Algorithm to Reduce the Use of Emergency Department Visits and Unplanned Hospitalizations Among Older People), which is not on this map. Cited by 14 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05221697 naunknown statusnot on this map

Effect of an Electronic Alert Management System Using Caregivers' Observations and Machine Learning Algorithm to Reduce the Use of Emergency Department Visits and Unplanned Hospitalizations Among Older People

TypeinterventionalSponsorPresageRan2020 to 2024Enrolled800ConditionsEmergenciesArmsPRESAGE CARE
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Mercedes Barrachina-FernándezPrograma en Ingeniería Biomédica (PhD), ETSI Telecomunicación, Universidad Politécnica de Madrid (UPM), Avenida Complutense, 30, 28040 Madrid, Spain.
Ana María MaitínCentro de Estudios e Innovación en Gestión del Conocimiento (CEIEC), Universidad Francisco de Vitoria, 28223 Pozuelo de Alarcón, Spain.
Carmen Sánchez-ÁvilaDepartment de Matemática Aplicada a las TICs, ETSI Telecomunicación, Universidad Politécnica de Madrid (UPM), Avenida Complutense, 30, 28040 Madrid, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-7690-1011
Juan Pablo RomeroFacultad de Ciencias Experimentales, Universidad Francisco de Vitoria, 28223 Pozuelo de Alarcón, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-3190-1296

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Monitoring of motor symptom fluctuations in Parkinson's disease (PD) patients is currently performed through the subjective self-assessment of patients. Clinicians require reliable information about a fluctuation's occurrence to enable a precise treatment rescheduling and dosing adjustment. In this review, we analyzed the utilization of sensors for identifying motor fluctuations in PD patients and the application of machine learning techniques to detect fluctuations. The review process followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Ten studies were included between January 2010 and March 2021, and their main characteristics and results were assessed and documented. Five studies utilized daily activities to collect the data, four used concrete scenarios executing specific activities to gather the data, and only one utilized a combination of both situations. The accuracy for classification was 83.56-96.77%. In the studies evaluated, it was not possible to find a standard cleaning protocol for the signal captured, and there is significant heterogeneity in the models utilized and in the different features introduced in the models (using spatiotemporal characteristics, frequential characteristics, or both). The two most influential factors in the good performance of the classification problem are the type of features utilized and the type of model.

Indexed as

Parkinson DiseaseWearable Electronic DevicesHumansMachine Learningmotor fluctuationsmotor symptomsParkinson´s diseasesensorstreatment

Identifiers

PMID34207198
PMCPMC8234127

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.