Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34207141›Full record

ArticleJournal of personalized medicine2021

Pediatric Oncologists' Experiences Returning and Incorporating Genomic Sequencing Results into Cancer Care.

Rebecca L Hsu, Amanda M Gutierrez, Sophie K Schellhammer, Jill O Robinson, Sarah Scollon, Richard L Street, Alyssa N Salisbury, Stacey Pereira, Sharon E Plon, Janet Malek and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of personalized medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Rebecca L HsuCenter for Medical Ethics and Health Policy, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX 77030, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7854-3246
Amanda M GutierrezCenter for Medical Ethics and Health Policy, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX 77030, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4496-5328
Sophie K SchellhammerCenter for Medical Ethics and Health Policy, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX 77030, USA.
Jill O RobinsonCenter for Medical Ethics and Health Policy, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX 77030, USA.
Sarah ScollonDepartment of Pediatrics, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX 77030, USA.
Richard L StreetDepartment of Communication, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77843, USA.
Alyssa N SalisburyDepartment of Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX 77030, USA.
Stacey PereiraCenter for Medical Ethics and Health Policy, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX 77030, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6541-3904
Sharon E PlonDepartment of Pediatrics, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX 77030, USA.
Janet MalekCenter for Medical Ethics and Health Policy, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX 77030, USA.
D Williams ParsonsDepartment of Pediatrics, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX 77030, USA.
Amy L McGuireCenter for Medical Ethics and Health Policy, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX 77030, USA.

Funding

Measuring Perceptions of Utility of Clinical Genome Sequencing: Instrument Testing and ValidationU01HG006485 · NHGRI · BAYLOR COLLEGE OF MEDICINE · PI MCGUIRE, AMY L, PARSONS, DONALD W. · 2012 to 2021
$22.1M
NCI NIH HHS U01HG006485NHGRI NIH HHS U01HG006485
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pediatric oncologists' perspectives around returning and incorporating tumor and germline genomic sequencing (GS) results into cancer care are not well-described. To inform optimization of cancer genomics communication, we assessed oncologists' experiences with return of genomic results (ROR), including their preparation/readiness for ROR, collaboration with genetic counselors (GCs) during ROR, and perceived challenges. The BASIC3 study paired pediatric oncologists with GCs to return results to patients' families. We thematically analyzed 24 interviews with 12 oncologists at two post-ROR time points. Oncologists found pre-ROR meetings with GCs and geneticists essential to interpreting patients' reports and communicating results to families. Most oncologists took a collaborative ROR approach where they discussed tumor findings and GCs discussed germline findings. Oncologists perceived many roles for GCs during ROR, including answering families' questions and describing information in lay language. Challenges identified included conveying uncertain information in accessible language, limits of oncologists' genetics expertise, and navigating families' emotional responses. Oncologists emphasized how GCs' and geneticists' support was essential to ROR, especially for germline findings. GS can be successfully integrated into cancer care, but to account for the GC shortage, alternative ROR models and access to genetics resources will be needed to better support families and avoid burdening oncologists.

Indexed as

cancer genomicscommunicationexome sequencinggenetic counselinggenomic sequencingpediatric genomicspediatric oncologyreturn of genomic results

Identifiers

PMID34207141
PMCPMC8235493

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.