ReviewNanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2021
Nanomaterial Databases: Data Sources for Promoting Design and Risk Assessment of Nanomaterials.
Review in Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
23 citing papers in PubMed.
- Machine learning reshapes the paradigm of nanomedicine research.Acta pharmaceutica Sinica. B · 2026Review
- Recent Advances in Machine Learning Models for Predicting Toxicity of Inorganic Nanoparticles.Chem & bio engineering · 2025Review
- Holistic concept guided quality control of traditional Chinese medicines for optimizing bioavailability.Chinese medicine · 2025Review
- Machine Learning-Driven Prediction of Reactive Oxygen Species Dynamics for Assessing Nanomaterials' Cytotoxicity.Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Unlocking the power of antimicrobial peptides: advances in production, optimization, and therapeutics.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2025Review
- Nanotoxicology: developments and new insights.Nanomedicine (London, England) · 2025Review
- Engineering copper and copper-based materials for a post-antibiotic era.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2025Review
- Nanomaterial-Based Sensors for Coumarin Detection.ACS omega · 2024Review
- Red blood cell-derived materials for cancer therapy: Construction, distribution, and applications.Materials today. Bio · 2024Review
- Nanomaterials for small diameter vascular grafts: overview and outlook.Nanoscale advances · 2023Review
- Principles and requirements for nanomaterial representations to facilitate machine processing and cooperation with nanoinformatics tools.Journal of cheminformatics · 2023Article
- Artificial intelligence and machine learning disciplines with the potential to improve the nanotoxicology and nanomedicine fields: a comprehensive review.Archives of toxicology · 2023Review
- SciRAPnano: a pragmatic and harmonized approach for quality evaluation ofFrontiers in toxicology · 2023Article
- Big Data in a Nano World: A Review on Computational, Data-Driven Design of Nanomaterials Structures, Properties, and Synthesis.ACS nano · 2022Review
- Trends and patterns in cancer nanotechnology research: A survey of NCI's caNanoLab and nanotechnology characterization laboratory.Advanced drug delivery reviews · 2022Review
- Potential Environmental and Health Implications from the Scaled-Up Production and Disposal of Nanomaterials Used in Biosensors.Biosensors · 2022Review
- Digital Innovation Enabled Nanomaterial Manufacturing; Machine Learning Strategies and Green Perspectives.Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- Molecular Imaging and Nanotechnology-Emerging Tools in Diagnostics and Therapy.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022Review
- Collection of Controlled Nanosafety Data-The CoCoN-Database, a Tool to Assess Nanomaterial Hazard.Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Engineered Nanomaterials in Soil: Their Impact on Soil Microbiome and Plant Health.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Nanomaterials have drawn increasing attention due to their tunable and enhanced physicochemical and biological performance compared to their conventional bulk materials. Owing to the rapid expansion of the nano-industry, large amounts of data regarding the synthesis, physicochemical properties, and bioactivities of nanomaterials have been generated. These data are a great asset to the scientific community. However, the data are on diverse aspects of nanomaterials and in different sources and formats. To help utilize these data, various databases on specific information of nanomaterials such as physicochemical characterization, biomedicine, and nano-safety have been developed and made available online. Understanding the structure, function, and available data in these databases is needed for scientists to select appropriate databases and retrieve specific information for research on nanomaterials. However, to our knowledge, there is no study to systematically compare these databases to facilitate their utilization in the field of nanomaterials. Therefore, we reviewed and compared eight widely used databases of nanomaterials, aiming to provide the nanoscience community with valuable information about the specific content and function of these databases. We also discuss the pros and cons of these databases, thus enabling more efficient and convenient utilization.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.