Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34206962›Full record

ArticleEntropy (Basel, Switzerland)2021

Real-Time Tool Detection for Workflow Identification in Open Cranial Vault Remodeling.

Alicia Pose Díez de la Lastra, Lucía García-Duarte Sáenz, David García-Mato, Luis Hernández-Álvarez, Santiago Ochandiano, Javier Pascau

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Entropy (Basel, Switzerland), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Alicia Pose Díez de la LastraDepartamento de Bioingeniería e Ingeniería Aeroespacial, Universidad Carlos III de Madrid, 28911 Leganés, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-1802-2884
Lucía García-Duarte SáenzDepartamento de Bioingeniería e Ingeniería Aeroespacial, Universidad Carlos III de Madrid, 28911 Leganés, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-7390-4946
David García-MatoDepartamento de Bioingeniería e Ingeniería Aeroespacial, Universidad Carlos III de Madrid, 28911 Leganés, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-5390-5768
Luis Hernández-ÁlvarezDepartamento de Tecnologías de la Información y las Comunicaciones (TIC), Instituto de Tecnologías Físicas y de la Información (ITEFI), Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (CSIC), 28006 Madrid, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-2637-8901
Santiago OchandianoInstituto de Investigación Sanitaria Gregorio Marañón, 28007 Madrid, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-3576-6498
Javier PascauDepartamento de Bioingeniería e Ingeniería Aeroespacial, Universidad Carlos III de Madrid, 28911 Leganés, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-1484-731X

Funding

European Regional Development Fund "Una manera de hacer Europa" PI18/01625Instituto de Salud Carlos III PI18/01625Ministerio de Ciencia, Innovación y Universidades 202050E304Ministerio de Ciencia, Innovación y Universidades PI18/01625
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Deep learning is a recent technology that has shown excellent capabilities for recognition and identification tasks. This study applies these techniques in open cranial vault remodeling surgeries performed to correct craniosynostosis. The objective was to automatically recognize surgical tools in real-time and estimate the surgical phase based on those predictions. For this purpose, we implemented, trained, and tested three algorithms based on previously proposed Convolutional Neural Network architectures (VGG16, MobileNetV2, and InceptionV3) and one new architecture with fewer parameters (CranioNet). A novel 3D Slicer module was specifically developed to implement these networks and recognize surgical tools in real time via video streaming. The training and test data were acquired during a surgical simulation using a 3D printed patient-based realistic phantom of an infant's head. The results showed that CranioNet presents the lowest accuracy for tool recognition (93.4%), while the highest accuracy is achieved by the MobileNetV2 model (99.6%), followed by VGG16 and InceptionV3 (98.8% and 97.2%, respectively). Regarding phase detection, InceptionV3 and VGG16 obtained the best results (94.5% and 94.4%), whereas MobileNetV2 and CranioNet presented worse values (91.1% and 89.8%). Our results prove the feasibility of applying deep learning architectures for real-time tool detection and phase estimation in craniosynostosis surgeries.

Indexed as

Artificial Intelligencecraniosynostosis surgerydeep learningphase estimationtool detection

Identifiers

PMID34206962
PMCPMC8303376

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.