Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34206772›Full record

ReviewCancers2021

Repurposing of Antimicrobial Agents for Cancer Therapy: What Do We Know?

Christina Pfab, Luisa Schnobrich, Samir Eldnasoury, André Gessner, Nahed El-Najjar

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cancers, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 50 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
50citing papers in PubMed
3.9field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

50 citing papers in PubMed, 69 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. The gut-heart axis in cardio-oncology.Cardiovascular research · 2026
    Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Drug repurposing of natural depsipeptide fromFrontiers in pharmacology · 2025
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Christina PfabInstitute of Clinical Microbiology and Hygiene, University Hospital Regensburg, 93053 Regensburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-3327-1400
Luisa SchnobrichInstitute of Clinical Microbiology and Hygiene, University Hospital Regensburg, 93053 Regensburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-4308-0122
Samir EldnasouryInstitute of Clinical Microbiology and Hygiene, University Hospital Regensburg, 93053 Regensburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-7048-7761
André GessnerInstitute of Clinical Microbiology and Hygiene, University Hospital Regensburg, 93053 Regensburg, Germany.
Nahed El-NajjarInstitute of Clinical Microbiology and Hygiene, University Hospital Regensburg, 93053 Regensburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-2278-8586
University Hospital Regensburg · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The substantial costs of clinical trials, the lengthy timelines of new drug discovery and development, along the high attrition rates underscore the need for alternative strategies for finding quickly suitable therapeutics agents. Given that most approved drugs possess more than one target tightly linked to other diseases, it encourages promptly testing these drugs in patients. Over the past decades, this has led to considerable attention for drug repurposing, which relies on identifying new uses for approved or investigational drugs outside the scope of the original medical indication. The known safety of approved drugs minimizes the possibility of failure for adverse toxicology, making them attractive de-risked compounds for new applications with potentially lower overall development costs and shorter development timelines. This latter case is an exciting opportunity, specifically in oncology, due to increased resistance towards the current therapies. Indeed, a large body of evidence shows that a wealth of non-cancer drugs has beneficial effects against cancer. Interestingly, 335 drugs are currently being evaluated in different clinical trials for their potential activities against various cancers (Redo database). This review aims to provide an extensive discussion about the anti-cancer activities exerted by antimicrobial agents and presents information about their mechanism(s) of action and stage of development/evaluation.

Indexed as

anthelmintic agentsantibioticsantifungalsantimalarial drugsantiviralsoff-targetsoncologyrepurposing drugsresistance

Identifiers

PMID34206772
PMCPMC8269327
OpenAlexW3175813596

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.