Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34206744›Full record

ReviewPharmaceutics2021

Polymer-Based Scaffolds Loaded with

Sibusiso Alven, Vuyolwethu Khwaza, Opeoluwa O Oyedeji, Blessing A Aderibigbe

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Pharmaceutics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Pharmacotherapy for Keloids and Hypertrophic Scars.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Green Synthesized Polymeric Iodophors with Thyme as Antimicrobial Agents.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Article
  10. Gels (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Revista brasileira de farmacognosia : orgao oficial da Sociedade Brasileira de Farmacognosia · 2022
    Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Sibusiso AlvenDepartment of Chemistry, University of Fort Hare, Alice 5700, Eastern Cape, South Africa.ORCID 0000-0001-7100-4007
Vuyolwethu KhwazaDepartment of Chemistry, University of Fort Hare, Alice 5700, Eastern Cape, South Africa.
Opeoluwa O OyedejiDepartment of Chemistry, University of Fort Hare, Alice 5700, Eastern Cape, South Africa.ORCID 0000-0002-1240-3718
Blessing A AderibigbeDepartment of Chemistry, University of Fort Hare, Alice 5700, Eastern Cape, South Africa.

Funding

Govan Mbeki Research and Development Centrem, University of Fort Hare GMRDCSouth African Medical Research Council SAMRC
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The treatment of wounds is one challenging biomedical field due to delayed wound healing common in chronic wounds. Several factors delay wound healing, including microbial infections, malnutrition, underlying physiological conditions, etc. Most of the currently used wound dressing materials suffer from poor antimicrobial properties, poor biodegradability and biocompatibility, and weak mechanical performance. Plant extracts, such as

Indexed as

Aloe verafilmshydrogelsnanofiberspolymerswound dressingswound treatment

Identifiers

PMID34206744
PMCPMC8309095

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.