Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34206468›Full record

SynthesisViruses2021

Convalescent Plasma for Pregnant Women with COVID-19: A Systematic Literature Review.

Massimo Franchini, Federico Prefumo, Gianpaolo Grisolia, Valentino Bergamini, Claudia Glingani, Marlene Pisello, Francesca Presti, Marco Zaffanello

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Viruses, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Coronavirus Disease-2019 in Pregnancy.Clinics in chest medicine · 2023
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Pharmacological consideration of COVID-19 infection and vaccines in pregnancy.Journal of the Chinese Medical Association : JCMA · 2022
    Review
  7. Convalescent plasma in hospitalized pediatric and obstetric coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) patients.Pediatrics international : official journal of the Japan Pediatric Society · 2022
    Article
  8. COVID-19 and Pregnancy.Discoveries (Craiova, Romania)
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Massimo FranchiniDepartment of Hematology and Transfusion Medicine, Carlo Poma Hospital, I-46100 Mantova, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-8795-0580
Federico PrefumoDepartment of Clinical and Experimental Sciences, University of Brescia, I-25123 Brescia, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-7793-714X
Gianpaolo GrisoliaObstetrics and Gynecology Unit, Carlo Poma Hospital, I-46100 Mantova, Italy.
Valentino BergaminiDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, I-37126 Verona, Italy.
Claudia GlinganiDepartment of Hematology and Transfusion Medicine, Carlo Poma Hospital, I-46100 Mantova, Italy.
Marlene PiselloObstetrics and Gynecology Unit, Carlo Poma Hospital, I-46100 Mantova, Italy.
Francesca PrestiDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, I-37126 Verona, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-2350-3263
Marco ZaffanelloDepartment of Surgical Sciences, Dentistry, Gynecology and Pediatrics, University of Verona, I-37126 Verona, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-8659-5505

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The treatment of COVID-19 is particularly critical in pregnant women, considering the potential teratogenic effects of antiviral agents and the immune-depression related with pregnancy. The aim of this review is to systematically examine the current evidence on the clinical use of convalescent plasma during pregnancy. The electronic databases Medline PubMed Advanced Search Builder, Scopus, Web Of Science and Google Scholar were searched (until 1 January 2021). Inclusion criteria were pregnant women with COVID-19 (or SARS-CoV-2 infection), in whom convalescent plasma (or hyperimmune plasma) was used as treatment. We searched clinical trial registries (censored 5 January 2021) for eligible studies under way. After elimination of duplications, the initial search yielded 79 potentially relevant records, of which 67 were subsequently excluded. The 12 remaining records were case reports involving 12 pregnancies. Six of the mothers were reported to be well, two were reported to have preeclampsia, and in one case each the maternal outcome was described as survival, clinical improvement, discharged with oxygen and rehabilitation. With regard to the neonates, two were declared to be well, four had transient morbidity, two were critically ill and one died; normal ongoing pregnancies, but no post-delivery information, were reported for the remaining three cases. Clinical trials under way or planned to investigate the use of convalescent plasma for COVID-19 during pregnancy are lacking. This is the first systematic review of the literature regarding the treatment of COVID-19 in pregnancy. The published literature data seem to indicate that convalescent plasma administered to pregnant women with severe COVID-19 provides benefits for both the mother and the fetus. The quality of the available studies is, however, very limited since they are all case reports and thus suffer from relevant reporting bias.

Indexed as

AdultAntiviral AgentsCOVID-19COVID-19 SerotherapyCritical IllnessDatabases, FactualFemaleHumansImmunization, PassiveInfant, NewbornPregnancyPregnancy Complications, InfectiousPregnant PeopleTreatment OutcomeAntiviral Agentsconvalescent plasmaCOVID-19fetushyperimmune plasmanewbornpregnancySARS-CoV-2

Identifiers

PMID34206468
PMCPMC8310344

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.