Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34206435›Full record

ArticleHealthcare (Basel, Switzerland)2021

How Do Patients with Life-Limiting Illness and Caregivers Want End-Of-Life Prognostic Information Delivered? A Pilot Study.

Ebony T Lewis, Kathrine A Hammill, Maree Ticehurst, Robin M Turner, Sally Greenaway, Ken Hillman, Joan Carlini, Magnolia Cardona

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Ebony T LewisSchool of Population Health, The University of New South Wales, Sydney 2052, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-9260-3727
Kathrine A HammillSchool of Science and Health, Western Sydney University, Campbelltown 2560, Australia.
Maree TicehurstSouth Western Sydney Clinical School, University of New South Wales, Liverpool 2170, Australia.
Robin M TurnerBiostatistics Unit, Otago Medical School, University of Otago, Dunedin 9054, New Zealand.
Sally GreenawaySupportive and Palliative Medicine, Westmead Hospital, Westmead 2145, Australia.
Ken HillmanSouth Western Sydney Clinical School, University of New South Wales, Liverpool 2170, Australia.
Joan CarliniDepartment of Marketing, Griffith University, Southport 4222, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-0446-9215
Magnolia CardonaInstitute for Evidence Based Healthcare, Bond University, Robina 4226, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-6499-2705

Funding

National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia 1054146
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We aimed to identify the level of prognostic disclosure, type of prognostic information and delivery format of prognostic communication that older adults diagnosed with a life-limiting illness or caregivers prefer to receive. We developed and pilot tested an open-ended survey to 15 older patients and caregivers who had experience in health services for life-limiting illness either for a relative, friend or themselves. Five hypothetical clinical scenarios of prognostic options were presented to ascertain preferences. The preferred format to receive prognostic information was verbal delivery by the clinician with a written summary. Photos and videos were less favoured, and a table with numbers/percentages was least preferred. Distress levels to the prognostic scenarios were low, with the exception of a photo. We conclude that older patients/caregivers want end-of-life prognostic information delivered the traditional way, verbally by clinicians. Options to deliver prognostic information may vary across patient groups but empower clinicians in introducing end-of-life discussions with patients/caregivers. Our study illustrates the feasibility of involving terminal patients and caregivers in research that contributes to eliciting prognostic preferences. Further research is needed to understand whether the prognostic preferences of hospitalized patients with life-limiting illness differ.

Indexed as

decision makingolder adultspatient preferenceprognosisterminally ill

Identifiers

PMID34206435
PMCPMC8303293

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.